[dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 134 - What To Do With Appendix A.5?
Todd Herr <todd.herr@valimail.com> Thu, 14 March 2024 14:53 UTC
Return-Path: <todd.herr@valimail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D97C7C14CE31 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Mar 2024 07:53:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.487
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.487 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=valimail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LpxTPQGYnXLt for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Mar 2024 07:53:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw1-x1129.google.com (mail-yw1-x1129.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1129]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48062C14F5EB for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Mar 2024 07:53:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw1-x1129.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-60a0599f6e5so9745777b3.3 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Mar 2024 07:53:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=valimail.com; s=google2048; t=1710428026; x=1711032826; darn=ietf.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=TPlyvX36NXlJ/QWydTwLH4nipxwj9Epbnmeg1QT+Cqw=; b=OqDK/AS3cUP+cnnvcDOdQPXjaeCv+uIRhPko2AF5kbwUFth8s0UsfP5dA+y2A9GM6o f84uwxjl+pNTfK1icWem+7YeUcopfQ2Bvw9LR0sm/nQn6CdC66/kXfyF6o4eTuCL4yED YnX8iGTFr2ajjEL49stFqV99nVRr38xcqU/c3UH48Yvl0F78ZcYTq8FbZVR4VSVRk53v 3OkKlSCbdwLzcdKuFnnJ7ka8a4/1IfvPvHBPIwO4yiFMmY+PuVBhIDQYJKePRedHALqr tqh97v0t1n8jCq7h9TS4ZOKQDtM/fdBHiFU51CnD6fXImJrB8YwoqSsFKFpOHiNKCCFy eqsw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1710428026; x=1711032826; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=TPlyvX36NXlJ/QWydTwLH4nipxwj9Epbnmeg1QT+Cqw=; b=f/zRwxBARoGQ5/XpDi67prvtDv0DaX8BmBpRP5T7y/r+Dvbo6psx8mwMGMKVw9jsG4 IfNlo5AEgMa/WPsa/GtxL3FQ5At8VqMFad2Ll9K9gMbqq+pnDUvx8IHm4PAGZN7gUVL7 JV+f9CuWULd2Y/Yvl5ApqAmy5hBPKH4oXyrKJM/wVNdiN6Zn1e8yzyDBmULNbOwJ5SEH UOdc+0D6epvKcaqzhvac7g9Hxci/Ttvv2/pPxZxgC3WvmKSv7PzX7fgYb+QaS3aps5bd SkR0Lz0tgeAm9kNlVEpqqGj7X06/l8jry9aCzSL5PMt9DqaqK8jHjSi82i6x2FPTVCcI VxRQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YycX2KFpUzIlhgSX8To+7MxeXlGEh9p4/JQ+inP1hCiA+Xp80uF D9RW6tSti7kBhU6WYEsljbheAlzQaOSEhsIuy2BUtmAuCp9EBGOXFP8nL8noasRasWIFo8hemd3 Om/9iGc7mtNsetDwKuSegoUOi356x7zH1q6jc93ag0pqByx05BIU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGjkOMMPHIij5+F6g6Rx7WIdZdGjM7UlPbduOn6WLt5EaVHcCfD/pTpJmU1N6tG4p8Yob2zxQS1rcnvJYBSKFA=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:3626:0:b0:dc2:3f75:1f79 with SMTP id d38-20020a253626000000b00dc23f751f79mr2014718yba.23.1710428026253; Thu, 14 Mar 2024 07:53:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Todd Herr <todd.herr@valimail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 10:53:30 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHej_8ndZuwM1ve3hhFvW5oFYFLj7mf=XJ0GFLQaPRBF4etHOA@mail.gmail.com>
To: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000eb839f0613a00e95"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/HoOqpgy_x04pyy4X4Ww-YqQYlmQ>
Subject: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 134 - What To Do With Appendix A.5?
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 14:53:50 -0000
Colleagues, Two people have spoken up on list asking for removal of this section (thread subject is "A.5 Issues with ADSP in Operation") while one person has registered opposition to the idea. I don't believe this is anywhere close to critical mass for consensus. I've opened the subject issue for this matter, and in that issue I floated the possibility of moving A.5 to section 7, Changes from RFC 7489, with some text along the lines of "we deleted the discussion of ADSP from this version, but it's preserved here for historical purposes" Discuss... -- Todd Herr | Technical Director, Standards & Ecosystem Email: todd.herr@valimail.com Phone: 703-220-4153 This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s) authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to this email and then delete it from your system.
- [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 134 - What To Do… Todd Herr
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 134 - What T… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 134 - What T… John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 134 - What T… Murray S. Kucherawy