Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 134 - What To Do With Appendix A.5?
"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Fri, 15 March 2024 01:29 UTC
Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C49F0C151983 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Mar 2024 18:29:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4FfX0QSaHtmO for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Mar 2024 18:29:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x131.google.com (mail-lf1-x131.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::131]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 016E9C151080 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Mar 2024 18:25:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x131.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-513d492c3cdso280257e87.0 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Mar 2024 18:25:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1710465922; x=1711070722; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=sbMBbCf58gg6H6fpkR3bV3bWidkOIkUJ6czMcE4uApI=; b=Z51LH3FLHygHrDdN/VSoeOghk0a6zP7L4fiBjWisUXYhNk/wkFpdavWlMgJphODv4R dgkYToxWNT+hRWn1eO4sF3oiLM20QC8d1PWc0PhpI3DCOUsn8kichwwcHDqUziWbD0Qf gOH4VfoTeyLE0xsGNFQW6X5UeYTEUrO0P/lgBx6Ps/vP2punvc7vQYFfDeGeSofA0gH5 xH7UXGSciroDyOp6T/ghJkWz2cQ4rbEZrO4q8tl58GSE7XvT9CtUlwrn8T40loBM1GOA O6Ny5nDXVWpJ5VnC8BUfFcN+M4IpgTFnwwS/XNDaWVgv695Sp8RdfD7d61Bnu24Ejwbf S5IA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1710465922; x=1711070722; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=sbMBbCf58gg6H6fpkR3bV3bWidkOIkUJ6czMcE4uApI=; b=ObMUrFoXR7fi5JupnLnOhMOiGDmR0hU9rmxyyTaMdU8sb86dBhDbGx+9DZoHcGJ7vu ZfuJerbL/z8s3pgbpb/nU5YsQQ9yhpwR0Ixi27PIH7JTvt7BZqCPeMDE24fHQ+QyLBSB woaPoNXdYpwE3PuZJBwXjLIVaDYbuNMvnBRg6Z7LZ9FZkVShb9vYuYrt/JKWBuZtPQcT 5JkmxPc49g4GDxAUV/U0MhlQv6jOyBhciJaPU6zxGOH6zitBfNUHBVmohf5ZA2fa1OdN po3ZprPevJjgwqDO48W1WQPbH3cFo6ceE/lb/rpbvnaEM3deCZ09ThNwCsmI/KHti6g0 hLcw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzD4EqlldZFUpoqpL8FMXAMZdkBGSxq1yvWJnRR6ZXjXwxSUrJI IPYigIRfcxqkH/zLB8FBk6OFBPN0xaLc4eK1EXgCAbyCjNYbGj/dwuJw7kaftqk6swh1xp9RY0g oPmAH1wjt2OlGJKC01EyTByTMVumcxOjOPgU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGg/ZdG0a7nrsxvQcZurlcQjajEyxhMjxC2O7FYdD2fpAF1HPWSYwJJHRD6XLEAb0/uM0Qms5VJIPLjV3q8+Xc=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:6914:0:b0:513:4658:3abb with SMTP id e20-20020a196914000000b0051346583abbmr2185179lfc.2.1710465921503; Thu, 14 Mar 2024 18:25:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAHej_8ndZuwM1ve3hhFvW5oFYFLj7mfxXJ0GFLQaPRBF4etHOA@mail.gmail.com> <20240314172007.220F8855BCCA@ary.qy>
In-Reply-To: <20240314172007.220F8855BCCA@ary.qy>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 11:25:09 +1000
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwZY5nWMyozK9M_OBm3EVV_YuyZ9Zc+AV+720_i8H6NhAg@mail.gmail.com>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Cc: dmarc@ietf.org, todd.herr@valimail.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a6d9a10613a8e184"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/R44D1jTpIsKHZMZiBrw1lQbdH9c>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 134 - What To Do With Appendix A.5?
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 01:29:28 -0000
On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 3:20 AM John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote: > As an author of the ADSP RFC, I enthusiastically support dropping it > into the memory hole. It was a bad idea then and time has not improved > it. I tend to agree. That appendix was meant to answer the question "Why DMARC and not ADSP?" but I think nobody is really asking that question anymore. -MSK
- [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 134 - What To Do… Todd Herr
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 134 - What T… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 134 - What T… John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 134 - What T… Murray S. Kucherawy