[dmarc-ietf] Messages passing more than one modifying intermediary?
Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com> Tue, 24 November 2020 23:23 UTC
Return-Path: <mike@fresheez.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6358F3A03EF for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 15:23:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.248
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.248 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mtcc-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z-zJ8X9mOsAL for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 15:23:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf1-x42a.google.com (mail-pf1-x42a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D6E33A03EE for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 15:23:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf1-x42a.google.com with SMTP id w187so547008pfd.5 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 15:23:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mtcc-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=iHaJDu4n7HFeQpyU17wZlrU/mxtmhjwSCX18kHaPWYk=; b=o5BZ+3pq7Fwx6ApgIbHc+nMLXUyL+a3S0kcKQMVHoKwrxp/5RlpvAfU4+h1xlgjmdl v8Pz/al2G32DCDC/df138BFEyXYK+99oBYlAXFoMIc5AlVBUgYXZ4U+hREWOdHLlyx3U IKQ+nbUF3KKADJD5rcz/KFS9AzK/zhwS+ysdcEJhE4eXz/EbudIqviYSqAua+Qk+PAqv 9Urpe+bEKjlPr6f/RivfCMvjHevvrM4MYUiH2+IkeggkQkrxCf23ZsJDXpPKnG/cGTQF poYDhb8wAoCECLeM0v9mrBy7j31wj2qVAlWFsNAYTrchXV4GsRQsa8BTcUgMSfctlTGa Lhfw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=iHaJDu4n7HFeQpyU17wZlrU/mxtmhjwSCX18kHaPWYk=; b=b3Ju/+iUpOKxnJq/CDTskZV68LvoMPEGwlVxxB3m6ue5rxPXwVLgKVXIktUgFdbGDA f4Opp0mIbXUzYTTvjvZZinKjPQtWPYoMumKpTxWAvaXetUZT0DokDrCp864mVdWkqls1 vx6d3jtLQlmx5b/JmYIMe1Kbrz+CpwknIRRJPw+A0pqc62/PZSOP7TOqIu1lYBADu7qs TSi4HFrkbG2vwX+jABzccmxgmNEpPuRgUoQ/6SaEI13hUtPMLRZ+bgDwYnkdLTzUdkXb UJRCn+QFEwqPHzullr/aCLlB1nUZ2oGs6u4ZMKXx/mfukdcMH/1fGT6ch7Oq2YFSnZu1 WYZA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531z5gBpCT6UJDn38r9ou/Ug21Hjyl5t4M723XsSiShkHGKjWRGk gcPB2FKnaEkeKmP71gqHCOLyqfm841pGlw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzoMMJLvz5VoGVKuwS6dF6MLNokhtD8oOWTZUUliP9IpLyaMDkjz/IKJJgnP7h5vpIDPrkJUw==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:3844:: with SMTP id nl4mr625027pjb.93.1606260222166; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 15:23:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mike-mac.lan (107-182-37-5.volcanocom.com. [107.182.37.5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a81sm104458pfd.178.2020.11.24.15.23.40 for <dmarc@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 24 Nov 2020 15:23:41 -0800 (PST)
To: "dmarc@ietf.org" <dmarc@ietf.org>
From: Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>
Message-ID: <d58d7c9f-1761-4369-41a1-4888dc7a0a21@mtcc.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 15:23:40 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/ND2T1aaU_oj8aU53nxBJj9gjPyw>
Subject: [dmarc-ietf] Messages passing more than one modifying intermediary?
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 23:23:44 -0000
Does anybody know what percentage of traffic that passes through more than one modifying intermediary in different administrative domains? I know that modifying intermediaries like mailing lists are relatively rare, so I'd think that messages that go through more than one would be extremely rare. I'm not looking for anecdotes, just hard data. Mike
- [dmarc-ietf] Messages passing more than one modif… Michael Thomas