IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] PSD Related Privacy Considerations For Aggregate Reporting Draft

Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com> Sun, 05 February 2023 05:00 UTC

Return-Path: <sklist@kitterman.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6C93C1575AD for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 4 Feb 2023 21:00:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=kitterman.com header.b="Q9luQiut"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kitterman.com header.b="gdcJjGdJ"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RZJnL9Iamrzq for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 4 Feb 2023 21:00:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from interserver.kitterman.com (interserver.kitterman.com [IPv6:2604:a00:6:1039:225:90ff:feaa:b169]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E693C1516FF for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sat, 4 Feb 2023 21:00:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from interserver.kitterman.com (interserver.kitterman.com [64.20.48.66]) by interserver.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3FEDF800F6; Sun, 5 Feb 2023 00:00:19 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903e; t=1675573205; h=date : from : to : subject : in-reply-to : references : message-id : mime-version : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : from; bh=MVq2CuEHklyOKCfpjbvH0UxnlHFkAsJkj+klFKVhDQY=; b=Q9luQiutpEouoZyPsEhvb+81OGqALkGJkgt7EHzs635IEI80r3GjPcmJBa3UMXMBx7uym QyPCsmrM/NIajnsBQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903r; t=1675573205; h=date : from : to : subject : in-reply-to : references : message-id : mime-version : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : from; bh=MVq2CuEHklyOKCfpjbvH0UxnlHFkAsJkj+klFKVhDQY=; b=gdcJjGdJ2HvVziG/2wwh1ff/GACCdzOxe+OGg6R9i2FCr4Xk61sbGNxfDyvUMcMFuqzwe 4ow8yHp3uOoVkzKMozTKUAKU0DM1ro3UC+FosbxcZik4jKaoaHAZasAOFN91Z8x7w9Nsux0 fHbyKfFr4stMrWP1Ypy5sMDscUKuY0y/UbwYbKejCAl40YeOu0IuHFUIVEIVK5iF0zVjbFG MdDP17btOiKmlEsAMhZtuf+FxaSo9yyKjeDFUASlBsDOBrNbUroVXicmVMmCgHmWADL/ksK zYGHVHUHnX4IllOc/CX1OkNOsUdBxUTaHrM2CmUqzwYplUWTHdaMxewMuL4A==
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (mobile-166-170-35-172.mycingular.net [166.170.35.172]) by interserver.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 11F8BF802DF; Sun, 5 Feb 2023 00:00:05 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2023 04:59:59 +0000
From: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <0e6e47b0-eba0-f5f9-87d6-73dad2be1b52@iecc.com>
References: <20230201210711.B2ACF86BE8D9@ary.qy> <727BD3F7-A855-43D1-A7AD-7284224C3574@kitterman.com> <0e6e47b0-eba0-f5f9-87d6-73dad2be1b52@iecc.com>
Message-ID: <61D715C1-AB6E-4ADE-AA55-A90AC5437DD8@kitterman.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/OU4sqV5-YYttvrAtAmFnYvONwQE>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] PSD Related Privacy Considerations For Aggregate Reporting Draft
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2023 05:00:37 -0000


On February 5, 2023 3:09:39 AM UTC, "John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com> wrote:
>> Sounds good.  Please @ me on the PR.  If it's a significant change, we should bring it back here for discussion.
>
>Because I find git baffling, made some changes to the aggregate reporting draft and then accidentally checked them into the main branch.  Oh, well.
>
>It says PSDs only get nonexistent domain reports, and has some new security considerations:
>
>https://github.com/ietf-wg-dmarc/draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting/commit/a6609ae6ab6d413aae77c171375f81e2b62ba4e5
>
>Take a look, tell me what seems wrong.

Seems generally good.  "non-existentl domain" needs fixing, but that's a nit.  I've done the mailing list subscriber estimate trick too.  Don't forget to clear out the note.

Scott K

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email