IETF Logo Mail Archive

[dmarc-ietf] Re: New Tack - Learning from ARC Experiment

John Levine <johnl@ietf.email> Mon, 18 May 2026 21:58 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: dmarc@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14079F05EDAA for <dmarc@mail2.ietf.org>; Mon, 18 May 2026 14:58:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1779141511; bh=xfaFhqIGneWyWmD+G0qFeY2WDySbB99tNPGbq3e6fnw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=Amb2RYdIPLg0ghc+Sb/e1TSuhlMhy3s5k3+eI9fRv2qWLbl17Yu1eiOQ23+oi8nHB 6cPMhq21IEn6bEox9RmY1geUY2Sk3KQ4mm8o9IKJEP/tMR76qCBLP67eZNruJ54olg NarbX0WTq4ZHgRUbmmaTg1zmsY60Hr9l8+BZpL4g=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b="merA8yWu"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ietf.email header.b="S7+V609v"
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F3Locufj39l7 for <dmarc@mail2.ietf.org>; Mon, 18 May 2026 14:58:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23B89F05ED99 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 May 2026 14:58:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 96902 invoked from network); 18 May 2026 21:58:22 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=17a836a0b8b7e.k2605; t=1779141492; x=1779487092; bh=xfaFhqIGneWyWmD+G0qFeY2WDySbB99tNPGbq3e6fnw=; b=merA8yWujs18C+7WE8N8H6tQ5uzq34Ybvc+5K5+T7MEGpyYhLZRvNQ5YtjJcr9oOzte1ORtJevuiFzXzqSJ+a3X/RyQn8Mn82F7GWqLxUnLwS4yBL7gft3Lil/O0vxz/59/1N9WH0O07fZGRPnREpCd2TzG1R3ydSeAt6102IYfL0CiVnYfJmB8x0k3zzMgtBGQx+ApHjVCi6R1XtE7LrrjDdrv1bWgsjg+wt39uVkPOAj1x8YRf+lPRbexabbCQLIh7cIUEbi13xSRTTYwWMwX6B1KVRB8Y6S4yQiw4iasMNMprRPEX8cjpQmpm6SlMGBpXzFwwpuQrRIhnIOGvRA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=ietf.email; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=17a836a0b8b7e.k2605; bh=xfaFhqIGneWyWmD+G0qFeY2WDySbB99tNPGbq3e6fnw=; b=S7+V609vDw09jcYxUu0QIH4r1GhowrT50HHLSpYBhMZ4+pBMIb20f5RvVmpv7m3teefE1Z2O8ppkLKdBWYhjyABdg0XJjWlCnKlS1rsLuw232bsuim/K/mOAfnSC1H/dsMBwjwuqRuM1+loC7MJt9XTsJydY977owmyqCVHQ7OvhVFmlYd1sS/nnnTUdBrj5BtHdNjVJHOMLNK6qUt9R98NywU58B23fKIfM7NN2ZCZViUYhjSPWshQkaeOsjDVSEnsSP9eRtJvFJKgIWurSS6CqakAszCzeId0hlsw4AdQiuLWNZKVYHsEuIHYzTR26XfslQPauaDl/Xq4mEkzCcQ==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA CHACHA20-POLY1305 AEAD) via TCP6; 18 May 2026 21:58:22 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id A5E3C10B2BCFB; Mon, 18 May 2026 17:58:20 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 18 May 2026 17:58:20 -0400
Message-Id: <20260518215821.A5E3C10B2BCFB@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <johnl@ietf.email>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <27147.34039.46743.981344@fireball.acr.fi>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
References: <IA1PR12MB653180F1812B340891121599B3382@IA1PR12MB6531.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> <27147.34039.46743.981344@fireball.acr.fi>
X-Headerized: yes
Cleverness: minimal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Message-ID-Hash: AVT2DGFJETWXGZMQFG7SOE3YPOAIKMHM
X-Message-ID-Hash: AVT2DGFJETWXGZMQFG7SOE3YPOAIKMHM
X-MailFrom: johnl@iecc.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-dmarc.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: kivinen@iki.fi
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [dmarc-ietf] Re: New Tack - Learning from ARC Experiment
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance (DMARC)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/TQsLr4_5Nx2vzdvm1h4WfYExP58>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:dmarc-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dmarc-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dmarc-leave@ietf.org>

It appears that Tero Kivinen  <kivinen@iki.fi> said:
>Trent Adams writes:
>> To that end, some folks seem to be indicating that we should do that
>> additional work here, within the DMARC WG.
>
>Yes, at least I think there is work we can do to make ARC better, and
>I still find it useful. ...

The usual question, what work are you planning to do?

R's,
John

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status