IETF Logo Mail Archive

[dmarc-ietf] Re: New Tack - Learning from ARC Experiment

John R Levine <johnl@ietf.email> Sat, 16 May 2026 16:13 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@ietf.email>
X-Original-To: dmarc@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: dmarc@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C6F6EF46FB8 for <dmarc@mail2.ietf.org>; Sat, 16 May 2026 09:13:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1778948021; bh=ii2rlZWWktSqqmFODKxXsioOlUHPatH++KhEefsMmn8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=HgnnFUis+mlMozKUWzyb1CVtaRxUsZRri40UHdeOcUp4s7NomRlNHuEDduJBqTsTR Ec+K6FMIvqlTPsTk7XDv2Tw7EhXML83WkR5r/Jgbngb6dck0GYuGnP+05RRrGCpbeE 0FQwJz5LJwaOjoXkRR5y5hYyt1OSFI/+MUxbgi78=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b="KXQ3jCLr"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ietf.email header.b="q9+26SQw"
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v-4o0TgfEONd for <dmarc@mail2.ietf.org>; Sat, 16 May 2026 09:13:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD904EF46FAD for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 May 2026 09:13:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 35861 invoked from network); 16 May 2026 16:13:36 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=8c136a0897b0.k2605; t=1778948006; x=1779293606; bh=ii2rlZWWktSqqmFODKxXsioOlUHPatH++KhEefsMmn8=; b=KXQ3jCLrmz8+DTd8Yh6vsDblsr4upiD6kAaurtkMN+NqENkqS0JFgXwX5qjYFSixWSSdz8+w0eL448HfDr33obo8dsAt80j/W698S8gwaIW2AIK84jc1sfJuREbqeKNn9lxJua6ufPDYtZCiZZ3odYwHv/B67kqQ9ZADEKlirrEYffCcuakQ6vcNto0EkiDRC4ygcd97U5HchWy8U8S6eoxmpo7x16uVo4u2SqNO6+qr6vy78jMUKizqJm6ulCYOEs/umoKN4CtuiJpIjWWThl7iWJrY74wt+D5iiBrgJwNWDUFX8bf2OTCqKNxj6BjSnRegb7glPq/GQ5SaGfBWiw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=ietf.email; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=8c136a0897b0.k2605; bh=ii2rlZWWktSqqmFODKxXsioOlUHPatH++KhEefsMmn8=; b=q9+26SQw1pKWhw8qapgwmxsruH3zFSdfWki9uHTd3xoeRNURHlRbylP57A1zpfbcbq68Yu0hJaC8VNWmSCjRXv2078cuXozI3QCRBIJGz414lSHRhIIZDckNE+Ow/u5pwnfwIV7x5UCNUh2E6SfZK2RXRSCvMYP06BBUCwBbc+BCsPoBLjKvU8EqjL60mxl452uIW7dai/kKerE4qAzKEjs1E25QqPVrFgzKrYngIGyED1NrhEZelK7qBxvP1YIG9sTBsiWM/oSrEmzXUCSmrUxZTp0EPIwaQvvrKH1PoGOicHDTfW05XPxeLvbdOeD3Hq9pZyx1yBo0uAMJPzxriA==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA CHACHA20-POLY1305 AEAD) via TCP6; 16 May 2026 16:13:35 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 3515610AA3EE7; Sat, 16 May 2026 12:13:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ary.qy (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFEB710AA3EC9; Sat, 16 May 2026 12:13:34 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sat, 16 May 2026 12:13:34 -0400
Message-ID: <3e73dc4a-1c7c-44f4-0910-9bc261ff46a3@ietf.email>
From: John R Levine <johnl@ietf.email>
To: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>, "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <d68908dc-4032-420f-b89c-749a75cde2c0@tana.it>
References: <IA1PR12MB653180F1812B340891121599B3382@IA1PR12MB6531.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> <2bafa613-1861-4dd1-8e15-e400b73ab50b@tana.it> <CAL0qLwb5ED=o+=OGrGr=eW4nX-A9DR4BSDVSkzsNtDr0kShyqA@mail.gmail.com> <20260512194027.262BE1099FC6B@ary.local> <274bc4f7-9fb3-4f1c-b202-0e13b17ea465@tana.it> <CAL0qLwY=Jyu5dhQfd94fWdJ3X=hp0dAf9a2Gf65VRNA8Ga9uaA@mail.gmail.com> <d68908dc-4032-420f-b89c-749a75cde2c0@tana.it>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Message-ID-Hash: K2F5FK4CNXVB5YCTFHP7OUQSWHN7WDEE
X-Message-ID-Hash: K2F5FK4CNXVB5YCTFHP7OUQSWHN7WDEE
X-MailFrom: johnl@ietf.email
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-dmarc.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [dmarc-ietf] Re: New Tack - Learning from ARC Experiment
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance (DMARC)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/XPa9MBiVnN4rLVo3fkoaA7NP_I4>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:dmarc-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dmarc-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dmarc-leave@ietf.org>

On Sat, 16 May 2026, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
> I agree that Trent's draft does not need to be grouped with DKIM2.  I am only 
> questioning the opportunity to link the analysis of the ARC experiment to the 
> emergence of DKIM2.

I haven't seen any interest in the DMARC group for work beyond declaring 
ARC to be dead, nor any interest in DKIM2 in ARC beyond what's obvious, 
the chain of DKIM2 signatures sort of resembles the chain of ARC 
signatures.

What work do you propose to do to support what you're asking for?
Personally, I'm out.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status