Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #28 - Failure report mail loops

John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Wed, 09 December 2020 15:23 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 045063A0DFB for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 07:23:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=pJsmvqzw; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=gXv/jWY7
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dQQKO2ryI7K6 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 07:23:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 077D73A0D84 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 07:23:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 60150 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2020 15:23:06 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=eaf4.5fd0ebda.k2012; i=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=zNySHTXgoaUWbSgWjmk25MkNWBENn3lJVwEQW+TeROs=; b=pJsmvqzwhsxfsbR9+djRp6N+4XEd7b6/6gF7l2PJiAnA/WvfKTIiP3LeSau2P/quwucderHGFCiRrRyHQNq2c8u2FaJ41o0p4hdkSkIMO5nwpceHypKBhIJUyayWJchKuZ6XCqd1CPDYfkrcP21kxzUe4dRAHVlIKKowgcULsX5uzRW5gk+Ot04FOYMlu9kXA8rS65QnaQyxuP5rR8gWChRi07eYDLzM3U6/PYp/4yfAoj8uWUuL+MFnnzCbA5i03UGGQGmzAn2kFstvNAN8SYhrrxT/mYPXX9rYDntcLCV+ai3ZVVGQ3Ig6l6F/uoBqiQd8Fr3mZiS46trjvbxedA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=eaf4.5fd0ebda.k2012; olt=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=zNySHTXgoaUWbSgWjmk25MkNWBENn3lJVwEQW+TeROs=; b=gXv/jWY7iYA1DiVCJbaMZp1PHolms37WNX3azxGACYFa1U8GcOP1MqggqB+XArvXDAkWqYBxVcvbwivgI88u7SkiOhSGEfNBROftdFnkXoBZNTb3yPd+fDd4eO4ngQfq2tFqWFs4k0TrcW47JodfNmWZZbJgu4sotICL3Q2PdJluuEIxJO2gS6i4c74a3DgFkb9Kj119PZXxjOA7S9Wi+d3v01iQ2geL7Kdw3QscU1ik7xWt5+WBWp9dwYvZpVkNaySVOKR/M1amAwC2orP0UPkgeXxVEyYcqtpiUurj/LDW2PD5V/8hUQHsQN65W2ePr6MhpsTpiKT3zDlPfQxTBA==
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPSA (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD, johnl@iecc.com) via TCP6; 09 Dec 2020 15:23:05 -0000
Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2020 10:23:05 -0500
Message-ID: <6a4335a-a043-b5b5-1e36-1debae7e7a9a@taugh.com>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>, dmarc@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <f71b1d66-0e35-8754-b93c-2c00183789fc@tana.it>
References: <20201209000447.205FF2938F97@ary.qy> <f71b1d66-0e35-8754-b93c-2c00183789fc@tana.it>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/YFPApGBh3ZIFlwMQ3nFDKzPmDDA>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #28 - Failure report mail loops
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2020 15:23:11 -0000

On Wed, 9 Dec 2020, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
> It seems better than the other three bullets, so I'd prepend it.  Does the WG 
> agree?

No.  This is not a problem.  There is nothing to fix.  Please close this 
ticket.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly