Re: [dmarc-ietf] What's the bis in DMARCbis?
John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Mon, 20 June 2022 14:36 UTC
Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ADECC15AAD5 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jun 2022 07:36:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=c0HsEFTc; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=CCluUAwe
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SuLEb8Am7qXm for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jun 2022 07:36:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 151E1C15AACA for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jun 2022 07:36:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 53647 invoked from network); 20 Jun 2022 14:36:18 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=d18d.62b085e2.k2206; bh=Q/iauRoVHYM57Uz65nMlB14KqDdCL/5MJPyf/5Qwlv0=; b=c0HsEFTc3PSq6pc320a0owPtqp3KKa17NxS0yXVL66qUwpLPluwktmHJ9RRDhce2YsRt4wW0DOGBqewt0+EGNlWuh8QhtM3D23RokRnxspeono9ujfrYgrcAhxrx6Gy3YLL/GIIluWUN93mhGgxafAylzKrgycp19KE2Fib0O6dyzwRuyxKnwr3d3ASijGZg1RANBohSmSG3vxiiDHvYjMfRLpSlFhQve645MhsGD1Po+zRf++0fDBk+oPA73utd2TDpAJUGf2PytjXIYO5ACCUgVKWIcYYfGfOCtvMUEmPXGMJxpujqH5DErPlBcnn6mToZ4Vh29bsGmR+9uS2I2Q==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=d18d.62b085e2.k2206; bh=Q/iauRoVHYM57Uz65nMlB14KqDdCL/5MJPyf/5Qwlv0=; b=CCluUAwexijRS6MAfWEtm6TkNYPiq3Ub1+JCyBxdpcOE4DVExXGIT1+EGgqIHhvrOCcE+UKV3tIHLWbc6cuIrHOXgwos8N+PvjUyWIt+4nZKEava17HNfO8x6pjZJO7pMi1cTlb6fSV6HQ5kxnVP1EhwdSZJIaQrh7zpUReHZ7qlJzvE+zkHFlg0HjEuiG8AdaGKAi3wRbs8w7XRI39gMlJDQs2dCvbxqoMa1T9B3j496oAUscZcakVNqIlMyVyswyxHSOAwfAtikiyut57IhxcKDCE61pw+WJRNT5/k7dsnTqFQWrkPKAG3o+Qf9cNTr2/PVXToytPaPbguvPxCCg==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 20 Jun 2022 14:36:18 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id E5E4243DFB72; Mon, 20 Jun 2022 10:36:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ary.qy (Postfix) with ESMTP id 849FC43DFB54; Mon, 20 Jun 2022 10:36:17 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 10:36:17 -0400
Message-ID: <17286569-1128-a02c-52b7-8f966eec4758@taugh.com>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: Ken O'Driscoll <ken@wemonitoremail.com>, Damian Lukowski <rfc@arcsin.de>
Cc: "dmarc@ietf.org" <dmarc@ietf.org>
X-X-Sender: johnl@ary.qy
In-Reply-To: <VI1PR01MB7053FF1C62BF37C2E57349E6C7B09@VI1PR01MB7053.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com>
References: <37897c2e-49a4-f2f4-de23-0a5fdcf03cd4@arcsin.de> <VI1PR01MB7053FF1C62BF37C2E57349E6C7B09@VI1PR01MB7053.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/YXXLuxGrxl2YipNW0D-cLe45QNk>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] What's the bis in DMARCbis?
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 14:36:26 -0000
On Mon, 20 Jun 2022, Ken O'Driscoll wrote: > Bis means "again", in this case it refers to the next iteration of the DMARC specification. It's an IETF naming convention, nothing to do with DMARC or the working group specifically. It's latin for "twice". The French use it for street addresses. An address that we would write "123 1/2 Foo St" would be "123 bis r. Foux". Many legal systems use the same convention to add sections to legal codes, e.g., between sec 345 and 346 they insert 345 bis to avoid renumbering. After bis comes ter. I haven't seen fractional addresses beyond that although in latin it'd be quart. and quint. Dunno how it made the leap from francophone law and geography to the IETF. Regards, John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
- [dmarc-ietf] What's the bis in DMARCbis? Damian Lukowski
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] What's the bis in DMARCbis? Ken O'Driscoll
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] What's the bis in DMARCbis? John R Levine