IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC, DMARCbis WGLC - Issue 144 Mention of ARC in DMARCbis

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Tue, 02 April 2024 18:18 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DC06C14F5F3 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 11:18:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eDOViJt_24yX for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 11:18:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x62c.google.com (mail-ej1-x62c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F8A8C151983 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 11:18:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x62c.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a46f056c29eso193460966b.1 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 02 Apr 2024 11:18:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1712081913; x=1712686713; darn=ietf.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=HI9OBz/9pnZUb8WShZAKvoapbBrMd6XT0PoH/DyFG20=; b=ilwBtzm+KuGH2UvTHMwWtE0ki+WqK5cXQa1Lor9me/GDfRKfUPINMba10jk+BxkvSq SJMhU/lNPNmWZ9NMPlW2P6vGqa3Wfn+/TkNVxen9zaNH0Ot8piSMnUNPUXuoeuddmYYz /NjXM7RQXkCunevH1dXUmYy8BRPbITA2Z30gA0hwHoDm5gAxJDS0RwhDxWtPA7AGdQ7p S2lwH8ftnNfXRZ7kQ6gmn5UnIUUWYkMqbTuAhTIjcqBCESNtBS1zTcdVxt+/wvMEUSMQ y8h5tdVtbkUVNwqgcyRwOpgDlhOcQNqUPJbgxWXRr+wUoe9PbKQoUM9jAtZ1QVlTVrwv iA1A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1712081913; x=1712686713; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=HI9OBz/9pnZUb8WShZAKvoapbBrMd6XT0PoH/DyFG20=; b=ty4a4TFyq6NueBTsRhYKrOYmeE2z3IQl9925D7V0mbsTD/2tgkzaDOtpFGPB0w5Ltk W6v3brvgrt5soQPev8gXbhmqwRTx/cSA7AM1kNljfusO6AAR1J3M+wlF7B5/1v+mSkM4 2Prign1z5pCXmKfLfCOqzRYX5Z7Zh1IQ+U0TcC+MLQLVHbkrc3hPS5hvttqcWFEK25YO fpTR0DW84BvFpKVSxGoKVIzxBI7Noa5F9eiu/k09n6Qx5VeU18tiLg1LppuJk2zyaMmr MF30eWTBTLyifpvVhpMH+gtxnBzbi3WCASOEfz59CfwKAkNXNtxSU6ZOSVb1Inbu1BDF da3w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyjkmWZk3uK77cLLJR8EDT84FGKNylmakCF1MLG6Oe8II3z1PVq np8GeswmPkH4Opxzy3CGasT5w6wQzzvwb89rvUbvf1KfY+fbYOcRNqqnolbvcxbGehTlOTiVv1v KoJHOp6nM6UiOOQXEh7yq501uR0/PcNxWKAs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEz973pwRkJboJXnIHKuF2mguDHnXf0zkJe/qEpG/fja0A8+I/b9H9FBBfdugKz1kLdu8u9t67fv0CGLwJGvLQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:f581:b0:a4e:4d67:25e7 with SMTP id cm1-20020a170906f58100b00a4e4d6725e7mr6984639ejd.2.1712081912525; Tue, 02 Apr 2024 11:18:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAL0qLwZKWNsV_CZ7C4ep88soaquhFG6FswoyNDWdfJ4HB7pamQ@mail.gmail.com> <20240402154918.6477686B0508@ary.qy> <CAL0qLwaaKTcQ+OyApjDn3yA0mrB+HYSurMR1pZP-angNRcPEQg@mail.gmail.com> <CAOZAAfOUAVs1=UdrU-gSiJ=4CH5d7btZ8N8C-iAqqJjNm4dUGg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOZAAfOUAVs1=UdrU-gSiJ=4CH5d7btZ8N8C-iAqqJjNm4dUGg@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 11:18:20 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwaxUXFNWSFGszmmaJct+2iucnd4zb_=aQUTAG80DMW+iA@mail.gmail.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000038f9fd06152122d2"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/ZMvp70YE6v4kQZkCY5HM0aHVbBw>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC, DMARCbis WGLC - Issue 144 Mention of ARC in DMARCbis
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 18:18:37 -0000

On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 9:03 AM Seth Blank <seth@valimail.com> wrote:

>
> I think details about the technique to which you're alluding, especially
>> with real world examples, anecdotes, or other data, would be really
>> valuable to publish somewhere, be that in this document or elsewhere.  Even
>> just a paragraph that explains what ARC brings that we didn't have before,
>> that can be used to mitigate DMARC damage, would be a step in the right
>> direction.
>>
>> The ARC usage document appears to have been parked and expired, so that
>> advice doesn't seem to exist anywhere now.  Is the plan to revive that, now
>> that we appear to have at least one source of experience?
>>
>
> At M3AAWG a month ago, a couple of major mailboxes agreed to share their
> experience (and success) with ARC to this list. It is apparently making a
> significant difference for their systems. Getting that data public is still
> slow moving.
>

That would be really interesting to see.  Since you have seen it, what's
your view on whether such material is a viable input to this WGLC?  Should
we wait for it?

-MSK, p11g

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email