[dmarc-ietf] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-01.txt

Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com> Mon, 14 January 2019 00:19 UTC

Return-Path: <sklist@kitterman.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 288F812F18C for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Jan 2019 16:19:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=kitterman.com header.b=WRy6KJwS; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kitterman.com header.b=cYR6o69T
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hYi31H_h-wbo for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Jan 2019 16:19:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from softlayer.kitterman.com (softlayer.kitterman.com []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9B4212D4EB for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Jan 2019 16:19:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201812e; t=1547425180; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding : content-type : from : subject : date; bh=OdproJYQbPwOB2UoPifqU2ywwKvwNtfJMfgVcA1Ndvw=; b=WRy6KJwSi+Nd1L1HEZI6FyUcpWsGq788Vk1In0sWlgE0tBH7uquY9dtZ 6GMooAqlIuUfSCbigKP49Em4jycmAA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201812r; t=1547425180; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding : content-type : from : subject : date; bh=OdproJYQbPwOB2UoPifqU2ywwKvwNtfJMfgVcA1Ndvw=; b=cYR6o69T1fL7YxljNMvYJKS7PT6UuqgrFFh5iYCMzHDyg9Cf44iefHKp g+omcL3UTvU7238dLnffkbQ/vtzg7O5QZp1IGTtrSPXc+jaOYwyS7GTRq2 LRCiBTaopATXNQ0xMOYUHINCEYi+yHYqlZ6/vLulHTuXRpmv8OFmzyjuwH NZY+8H6MBhRuzxFD6jL8JXSPZYRD4Hc9ZMW1xE4wNJzf2sawb5pItTNWO7 BSesk0msXC6zEfVcDR7hUdlOtEalkcpW6qrpOJ/OFREl4F56cQyfD+y9V4 yLP+TtG6XSYGUi1FV5ikTudiqF5btk2AT05GDGxaSFDYwSS4DlQAEA==
Received: from kitterma-e6430.localnet (static-72-81-252-22.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net []) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by softlayer.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 625362D4078E for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Jan 2019 18:19:40 -0600 (CST)
From: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2019 19:19:39 -0500
Message-ID: <5126347.eOcQ2jtf8Q@kitterma-e6430>
User-Agent: KMail/4.13.3 (Linux/3.13.0-163-generic; KDE/4.13.3; x86_64; ; )
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/a4OrkO2ap1yvxf1oPUGyUuJViQI>
Subject: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-01.txt
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 00:19:50 -0000

This update removes the IANA registry (which is what I think I was supposed to 
do based on the feedback to date).  I also bulked up the Privacy/Security 
considerations descriptions since they are no longer mitigated.

I'd like feedback on the best path forward.  Essentially this draft replaces 
the IANA registry with an undefined way to know where PSD DMARC is 
appropriate.  I think we need something better than that, but I didn't know 

Suggestions please.

Scott K

----------  Forwarded Message  ----------

Subject: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-01.txt
Date: Sunday, January 13, 2019, 04:16:03 PM
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
CC: dmarc@ietf.org

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts 
This draft is a work item of the Domain-based Message Authentication, 
Reporting & Conformance WG of the IETF.

        Title           : DMARC (Domain-based Message Authentication, 
Reporting, and Conformance) Extension For PSDs (Public Suffix Domains)
        Author          : Scott Kitterman
	Filename        : draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-01.txt
	Pages           : 9
	Date            : 2019-01-13

   DMARC (Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and
   Conformance) is a scalable mechanism by which a mail-originating
   organization can express domain-level policies and preferences for
   message validation, disposition, and reporting, that a mail-receiving
   organization can use to improve mail handling.  DMARC policies can be
   applied at the individual domain level or for a set of domains at the
   organizational level.  The design of DMARC precludes grouping
   policies for a set of domains above the organizational level, such as
   TLDs (Top Level Domains).  These types of domains (which are not all
   at the top level of the DNS tree) can be collectively referred to as
   Public Suffix Domains (PSDs).  For the subset of PSDs that require
   DMARC usage, this memo describes an extension to DMARC to enable
   DMARC functionality for such domains.

The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:

There are also htmlized versions available at:

A diff from the previous version is available at:

Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:

dmarc mailing list