IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 49: remove normative requirement on policy tag placement

Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com> Sun, 07 June 2020 23:06 UTC

Return-Path: <sklist@kitterman.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F8AB3A0477 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Jun 2020 16:06:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=kitterman.com header.b=Vic9CS12; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kitterman.com header.b=sKMvaFiw
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ehRh0pjjFsBi for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Jun 2020 16:06:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from interserver.kitterman.com (interserver.kitterman.com [64.20.48.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38A9A3A0437 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Jun 2020 16:06:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from interserver.kitterman.com (interserver.kitterman.com [IPv6:2604:a00:6:1039:225:90ff:feaa:b169]) by interserver.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38AE0F801EA for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Jun 2020 19:06:28 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903e; t=1591571188; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding : content-type : from; bh=PPpIEooM1YDk6UQ4SkFvJUGVuGfG3uPEIBGvaoL8NYQ=; b=Vic9CS12FC25Xy/3tA5EHakzZZV7kmC6FxATp3iQ+kdeGL3x6P88zNw+8xalKGqKe+m0l 22G4YR+vcTXvbzvAA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903r; t=1591571188; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding : content-type : from; bh=PPpIEooM1YDk6UQ4SkFvJUGVuGfG3uPEIBGvaoL8NYQ=; b=sKMvaFiwyPydgi05wqlzXqYqd8kInMUTa2YO7Sl2PmFMhOI7bgQfNvVSzde8/7GTCTZ2L Abq8n8H0Yzy+986iXPhXKadJ49Hxi8GJZeV1cWrLD2b31Ajfwz5lkBET1D8qDFwaDr51G7q tNT7uEZnuS87JjshwbrFBAw6XmUBirUo2fnjTYAKi9TPVgoiiGMFqPxmKIYKY3ESsWklvAK Nfh5bClO10zvaom3MkJfowg/kYKtRlPnQx04qA0KGurc5IH7cdv1wdba2xvzg119ChF2EkW 2nPq5r1JD2UV/dTDLoIhEVF/KGLCw5SHxOsuo0gGd0EZ5Vk4TjLDigYanBMg==
Received: from sk-desktop.localnet (static-72-81-252-22.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net [72.81.252.22]) by interserver.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEFABF801AA for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Jun 2020 19:06:27 -0400 (EDT)
From: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2020 19:06:27 -0400
Message-ID: <4766648.lM4k2y0xV2@sk-desktop>
In-Reply-To: <CAOZAAfOX3vptGrQSBkMwZc0AZKkaYSNtOpwOY4FsKiYZwwfjiQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOZAAfP9AiYi2Gpyd2gfhbN5tUmTA5oH4_bOGq_HY4JnqYT+fQ@mail.gmail.com> <7c29c378-56cf-d601-6a18-215fe2b502d2@tana.it> <CAOZAAfOX3vptGrQSBkMwZc0AZKkaYSNtOpwOY4FsKiYZwwfjiQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/auylVWkZpfXbpT2vrP0IN-bZpwY>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 49: remove normative requirement on policy tag placement
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2020 23:06:31 -0000

On Sunday, June 7, 2020 4:37:42 PM EDT Seth Blank wrote:
> As Chair, I'm closing ticket #49 and recording the consensus of the group
> as in favor of removing the constraint.

Thanks.  In the discussion about that ticket there was an additional 
suggestion about making p= optional which was outside the scope of that 
ticket.  I've filed:

https://trac.ietf.org/trac/dmarc/ticket/72

to capture that.

Scott K

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email