Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC alignment conflicts with RFC 5322 on the use of the From and Sender header fields

Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com> Sun, 07 June 2020 23:08 UTC

Return-Path: <sklist@kitterman.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A21A63A0486 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Jun 2020 16:08:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=kitterman.com header.b=MxJ7HLNn; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kitterman.com header.b=BNzLG00x
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sl-yX5qmYVUO for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Jun 2020 16:08:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from interserver.kitterman.com (interserver.kitterman.com [64.20.48.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57B513A0477 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Jun 2020 16:08:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from interserver.kitterman.com (interserver.kitterman.com [64.20.48.66]) by interserver.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1965F801EA for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Jun 2020 19:08:30 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903e; t=1591571310; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding : content-type : from; bh=LW+yM4OwDjbd6Gttv2UGTrqdT077XYHjIr8770jkAcw=; b=MxJ7HLNnuJHp3Rrl3gJBVcwrHsfwY61A2E0kF2pe59huHTXELZavGc3GWek/eAoU5eG34 FGRwV47lEuiLO0sBA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903r; t=1591571310; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding : content-type : from; bh=LW+yM4OwDjbd6Gttv2UGTrqdT077XYHjIr8770jkAcw=; b=BNzLG00xNSFQ0drzdSuK4OT70V4GvYDfWHLIjEPlSia4mRAStkLKk/cPkP2Jyv5UHuWos BFWJqq4uc7CBMAKHDeMBlTtwc958gMPQaRQuXpqigA9VbHnpdJ8vcjLr2UmOiT4nvvOxfpX dpIB0a+PRBUEQCkb35z62sYL64lAFcoUUyahvZ8jzV6aB94uy8WmX/40g43h3ehBJFe/9GI Je1wUN92mUWTTQT6TFsSpvHFubFp/ACQs6N7vddn0du12S9J2Uo0IKiTpzKqKhtym2gm1zu +yazPNtE5pYFOiiR6fIad0YI3o8O+Vy8okbo5We3VTxQ3Eui1kvDAY8gDx6A==
Received: from sk-desktop.localnet (static-72-81-252-22.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net [72.81.252.22]) by interserver.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75D0DF801AA for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Jun 2020 19:08:30 -0400 (EDT)
From: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2020 19:08:30 -0400
Message-ID: <5470782.pd3ty62yEX@sk-desktop>
In-Reply-To: <fbbcc299-98f3-5d23-15e1-1f89fa03b9a7@gmail.com>
References: <DM5PR0601MB367115AD49513EAF3953716CF68B0@DM5PR0601MB3671.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> <46e045ae-9691-4f5b-86bf-142c066458d8@www.fastmail.com> <fbbcc299-98f3-5d23-15e1-1f89fa03b9a7@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/8QQP7LnZBy5L8xGOWx8hjmK1B7s>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC alignment conflicts with RFC 5322 on the use of the From and Sender header fields
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2020 23:08:33 -0000

On Sunday, June 7, 2020 5:53:08 PM EDT Dave Crocker wrote:
> On 6/7/2020 10:53 AM, Stan Kalisch wrote:
> > Assuming this can be practically done, I would rephrase this,
> > "...[E]stablish how MUAs should display trust data to users."
> 
> Since there has been a demonstrated lack of efficacy in this sort of
> display, there needs to be an objective basis for knowing that any new
> such requirement will be useful.  Good luck with that.
> 
> On 6/6/2020 2:42 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > 1.  I think the domain displayed to the end user matters.  In my sample
> > size of 1, it matters to me.  I know I'm not the average user, but
> > independent of t
> 
> I might be wrong, but I believe the IETF does not intend to make global
> standards on the basis of possible utility for only one engineer working
> on the specification.  Or two.  Or three.
> 
> cf, above.

Conveniently, I'm not proposing any new requirements.

Scott K