IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] About user notification in the MUA

Stan Kalisch <stan@glyphein.mailforce.net> Sun, 07 June 2020 23:45 UTC

Return-Path: <stan@glyphein.mailforce.net>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B48743A07BE for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Jun 2020 16:45:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mailforce.net header.b=nOf5yznX; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=AkQRv1SF
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nYxX5P97Pauc for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Jun 2020 16:45:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8060B3A07BD for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Jun 2020 16:45:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DAA33ED for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Jun 2020 19:45:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap6 ([10.202.2.56]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 07 Jun 2020 19:45:51 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailforce.net; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to :subject:content-type; s=fm3; bh=qz5uNf9O0rbsJz4S6hdZHRxjwzcJ2PL AzWnecQTAOxA=; b=nOf5yznX7usB/Kk9Nw//J+Dvep5Dpsz/cCKaqqXppwo0t+s Sf4kwkAQJTqKkuQdgDrXh71mRwSPSQhmPTF7dYHxiCA2Ge83Mo4twM/FA7sud7Y7 FWWUTA0G56heuTiRkIg9mbOjLIyDAzA7/W6A1Dx++uDms9YOz130nZVoTuT3NXjN FDEmXmpd9oUDb3NYaoRsos6AI7HSxXLn1VKlLdrKn5vUOfChfQwjaU78xY/NPbLI sMq+zCR+vVcXEnw29t7qhuD97ivhxJ8BZArXbjHl8///kyMGP3RyPOqBBts2Ky29 KoIUITjr2lqxMmSV5qrNBQ0ACcWq8OvsqLLljtw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=qz5uNf 9O0rbsJz4S6hdZHRxjwzcJ2PLAzWnecQTAOxA=; b=AkQRv1SFaXf4YSuZO9RXBx E7UJ4HUxoIojJdl8W+HYpQMf1MHdts3rhSIxb+jLjQ43XoolUi0ufrkRvauwkxL4 VaTrhSRIR1cuaFAf7IIz/sp5FDzujrvCgvkYcA5RdOkijQGapCZVM6aCsqQQuibm M2L/t7IX8NUr2aEWuMStJU2UgD9RbLLbIWBOoNq1Vq9D8839iP4kGnIy2fZov8fq Sthr7NW0HOuGqFNBtXiiJT2/SGQPjnTu1Figl5jZZ4M5y9tl/8uon6UFVQcMfKzW GLBcgg/2OyVO9yD8v94LehMoT/MofaLpfbRsLKCVjbhNyRyWmuJ7z8/0B7mBYaoQ ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:LnzdXrLdGIG8vSsgjUBDbewbYucRQgiIyqJnRUBBMP0VF-nLifbSvA>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrudehtddgvdeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvufgtsegrtd erreerredtnecuhfhrohhmpedfufhtrghnucfmrghlihhstghhfdcuoehsthgrnhesghhl hihphhgvihhnrdhmrghilhhfohhrtggvrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpefgie ejteehfeeguefgfeefvedtvdegudekvdeukeejveejffeiiefhieejudelieenucevlhhu shhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehsthgrnhesghhlhi hphhgvihhnrdhmrghilhhfohhrtggvrdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:LnzdXvJs0lJ61w_esP4tmgGUOrPh9k1gFpGyhO-Ts5tVJ5grfLRjQg> <xmx:LnzdXjsn8pMvUy5TBHFRfyDH2yS5UmyCbwWx1GSciRfCM22GSfwyHQ> <xmx:LnzdXkYioSZ4_6Fh0QX4Ce5YZKHRa8CQ1f9VnrivqUoEKvdOvjI6PQ> <xmx:L3zdXmrrn9V4acU9LoXA68Pq5LVhxRrEWNV4BdrlOASt8r_aOhl9EQ>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id BE0E11400A1; Sun, 7 Jun 2020 19:45:50 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.3.0-dev0-519-g0f677ba-fm-20200601.001-g0f677ba6
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <33b12416-cd41-4826-9950-3afc9fdb83bf@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <dbcc34fb870e45b2b1cd3903b90b8a87@bayviewphysicians.com>
References: <DM5PR0601MB367115AD49513EAF3953716CF68B0@DM5PR0601MB3671.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> <11640715.3lbasgNmsr@sk-desktop> <25420528-d356-0273-ceb3-c44a3c94bc91@gmail.com> <3138524.EPDo7oxCqE@sk-desktop> <4620e21f-32c5-7735-9faf-a5b045f84c0d@bluepopcorn.net> <ac0f684a-4c00-0564-8cf9-5b955e037c87@tana.it> <14fe18acad53467a8027e680dfc1067e@bayviewphysicians.com> <46e045ae-9691-4f5b-86bf-142c066458d8@www.fastmail.com> <fbbcc299-98f3-5d23-15e1-1f89fa03b9a7@gmail.com> <dbcc34fb870e45b2b1cd3903b90b8a87@bayviewphysicians.com>
Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2020 19:45:06 -0400
From: Stan Kalisch <stan@glyphein.mailforce.net>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="76c48f6cba4b48f6b7b13e2402de1ffb"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/1YgtUEQ5up8wf0Qs-K41HG1PVd4>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] About user notification in the MUA
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2020 23:45:54 -0000

On Sun, Jun 7, 2020, at 7:04 PM, Douglas E. Foster wrote:
> The problem with all current notification methods is that they are relatively primitive, often communicating nothing substantive about the suspicious message characteristics.

And you propose the average user can understand, much less take the time to understand, the substance?


Stan

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email