Re: [dmarc-ietf] Final, I hope, tweaks to the tree walk

Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> Mon, 27 June 2022 10:20 UTC

Return-Path: <vesely@tana.it>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BC92C157B5F for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 03:20:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.005
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.005 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.876, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=tana.it header.b=YY7PyDmA; dkim=pass (1152-bit key) header.d=tana.it header.b=AY70meMh
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L5th9pp6viby for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 03:20:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wmail.tana.it (wmail.tana.it [62.94.243.226]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6932C14CF1B for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 03:20:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tana.it; s=epsilon; t=1656325199; bh=Fg8tcA4m3Formur4Z4E2RmtrY6JoBq/ctmt+4XH81hk=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=YY7PyDmA/g4NNs8XuS44bO8fNu90SeEt0F6rMqThXJz4HuhMc9YWereMMWEbJOvm7 l3Py8vukrbjxcn+0WoEBQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tana.it; s=delta; t=1656325199; bh=Fg8tcA4m3Formur4Z4E2RmtrY6JoBq/ctmt+4XH81hk=; h=Date:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=AY70meMhgI7IunokKvtRWstjphAWrlaw4kEa7bDw6sAfIO/70drEQwGObINYvYGDR TaLRa4dTpdnx+m9gMO9yixewdpnkBotr9ZzYZPCtwEO0sd5e2ZkKishtCSSHN+E1aN +0jVT9QJo2FxvrYCBMRLHQ9BOxgK9fYCpm0Ug2ptCDY+xF7SJIGi9oisKL0gm
Author: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Received: from [172.25.197.111] (pcale.tana [172.25.197.111]) (AUTH: CRAM-MD5 uXDGrn@SYT0/k, TLS: TLS1.3, 128bits, ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) by wmail.tana.it with ESMTPSA id 00000000005DC0CE.0000000062B9844F.000026DE; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 12:19:59 +0200
Message-ID: <2bc4e123-8711-7538-599e-727d8ea9caff@tana.it>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 12:19:59 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, dmarc@ietf.org
References: <20220626154211.6893F4452D0F@ary.qy>
Authentication-Results: tana.it; auth=pass (details omitted)
From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
In-Reply-To: <20220626154211.6893F4452D0F@ary.qy>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/cq7IFYOO_kFyNcrcsW_95KOsfDY>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Final, I hope, tweaks to the tree walk
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 10:20:14 -0000

On Sun 26/Jun/2022 17:42:10 +0200 John Levine wrote:
> It appears that Alessandro Vesely  <vesely@tana.it> said:
>>> One question is what do you do if the DMARC record for your original From: 
>>> domain has psd=y.  My text says you ignore it since if you're sending mail, 
>>> you're not really a PSD.
>>I disagree.  If a PSD sends messages, e.g. uk.com, it should still set psd=y, 
>>and there's no reason to ignore it. ...
> 
> You might want to look at the draft and see what it says.
> 
> In this case it says if the From domain's DMARC record has psd=y, you
> ignore it in that case.  If you find psd=y waslking up from a subdomain
> you handle it normally.


Please recall what you said in April:

     How about if we say that if the initial domain has psd=y, that's the org
     domain and you don't look anywhere else.  That is easy to explain and I
     don't think we are likely to find anything that better matches the
     expectations of people who send mail from PSDs.
      https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/UEwREV5oDD0BoyNpaUB9GN6ixtI


Best
Ale
--