IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Feedback on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-02

"Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com> Fri, 12 April 2019 15:23 UTC

Return-Path: <kurta@drkurt.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41A181202DE for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 08:23:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=drkurt.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nxgvxpbiKoNu for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 08:23:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it1-x12d.google.com (mail-it1-x12d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 382C71202CE for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 08:23:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it1-x12d.google.com with SMTP id y134so16291119itc.5 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 08:23:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=drkurt.com; s=20130612; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=72PgCWN6M+bKndcwELmgjkfVgSEpyU/bgmsLUEw0cEU=; b=JJ4Qh1EBlzPif3Utfy7EhTWtlMhoiNEM2N+Is6QIhroyipAgeLOUmMpi8d4g00aP9f UPej2zFnXZb0vqRRdlkhSu9USbUxg++fLklnaDlE2nbXfS4R3jkrol2GYEaV+eLqqGfv xWBBx559LInG8kTQj5oFNm5L8Bb8W4D80Wxxk=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=72PgCWN6M+bKndcwELmgjkfVgSEpyU/bgmsLUEw0cEU=; b=hOe36/njWR7+Q0AsyYMvW+b3IUHu7snyn2yVNj6UlSKCaCyaoQwlFml+Wq8fKDvBBn 6RcT15q5b5ESClsbsTz2DrPabkmfdY94y6cX1/Jlo9uuQh5IP7Rdfup/p764iHS++EG6 xyBmED60osNCLoPtfl3IBUYCFyafBAg/WE06LGOo8VfT48QbJ571cgAiU74FMbQ1o2XR jLqhVLEkybYhuNPoe14r52F7mDR08H9unctIeAuNlTQUBu7Mw3n4Czt1G2iagw/6eVwh s9luDPBQ4+t8L+qsCY8sr0z7MWoK2GBGt8Feft22nhRmeiNJKd5MPW9y2OmbeN0p1fsK dbqg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXmi/9EJLJrB0YJwKARUwW5JNG2G55BjfrwPus4TFUplocl1CBP /XWVHXrvFy+R4aNbIMIxaKt1gvZ4EdOLp0/L0WyyBA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy9QH8dGp9C4tlwS01PqvTF5IQ79XRcqxhiQvXpGjfjPUFsSUa8BLSD5u04kfI2+4wqNaVk/0Bp1MoctPOdyfo=
X-Received: by 2002:a24:9cc2:: with SMTP id b185mr14484740ite.141.1555082608445; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 08:23:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CABuGu1oE+W7_==GxG0Qmo9WxcPWm5in50EZwU+kSEJ4a0=QZzA@mail.gmail.com> <2560485.41NbCdns5Z@kitterma-e6430>
In-Reply-To: <2560485.41NbCdns5Z@kitterma-e6430>
From: "Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 08:23:01 -0700
Message-ID: <CABuGu1oD=vnCqjCaaSt_Zhvo0btTz7vCfk8vXwP8jx_NdhhyNg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
Cc: "dmarc@ietf.org" <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000792271058656e20a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/g165e5nMxZqxTKWgGIpQ5vn5Hrs>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Feedback on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-02
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 15:23:31 -0000

On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 7:57 PM Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
wrote:

> On Thursday, April 11, 2019 03:33:34 PM Kurt Andersen wrote:
> > More substantively, in Appendix A, the case is being advanced for
> "concerns
> > associated with Multi-organization PSDs that do not mandate DMARC usage".
> > I'm not sure why "multi-organization" is an appropriate qualifier, nor as
> > to what mandated DMARC usage has to do with any of the privacy concerns.
> > Neglected DMARC usage is what leads to the spillage up to the PSD level.
>
> When you say "Neglected DMARC usage", it gives the impression that you
> think
> not participating in DMARC is somehow negligent.  It's not.
>

I'm using that term in the context of what you are deeming "mandated
usage". Hence, not doing it is neglecting that mandate.

--Kurt

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email