Re: [dmarc-ietf] Trac #117
Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> Sat, 14 August 2021 15:31 UTC
Return-Path: <vesely@tana.it>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65A083A1481 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 08:31:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1152-bit key) header.d=tana.it
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j9NUt5KNG8_4 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 08:31:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wmail.tana.it (wmail.tana.it [62.94.243.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 155823A145B for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 08:31:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tana.it; s=delta; t=1628955059; bh=Ho+ma+4x6XKYbAUGKziBT5xi0POG6qoB0r33/6LSV4E=; l=283; h=To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=BYSmwcPEUxxp0Di8dkOJZbiUfgBdI02FaJp9TdnxF6938rnUrpdqt3h9YgoLQjv1s U7rIyrZMOZIDhno9oaidfZcDvO05493Qg6vRvh0y2j87C6Xdh1VOkYINBOnVIl/iLW UUK8Bl9IOpT8LrRsGYPyho4dK8gtWujwii5uR0YHKxZ7AaOiFF67P966T/zUu
Authentication-Results: tana.it; auth=pass (details omitted)
Original-From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Received: from [192.168.1.103] ([2.198.14.128]) (AUTH: CRAM-MD5 uXDGrn@SYT0/k, TLS: TLS1.3, 128bits, ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) by wmail.tana.it with ESMTPSA id 00000000005DC03D.000000006117E1B3.0000541B; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 17:30:59 +0200
To: dmarc@ietf.org
References: <MN2PR11MB4351120A4D96586809D3D80AF7FB9@MN2PR11MB4351.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Message-ID: <0bc87d3f-823d-e7d5-25a4-ed644bc6119c@tana.it>
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2021 17:30:58 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR11MB4351120A4D96586809D3D80AF7FB9@MN2PR11MB4351.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/pDbpZ7jVphkpoWoYSUsj-GQoeyw>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Trac #117
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2021 15:31:20 -0000
On Sat 14/Aug/2021 16:10:45 +0200 Brotman, Alex wrote: > Folks, > > A ticket was opened to add a "human_result" to the SPF results in the report. As DKIM has similar, I don't necessarily see an issue here. That field addition seems to me to be a due fix. Best Ale --
- [dmarc-ietf] Trac #117 Brotman, Alex
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Trac #117 Alessandro Vesely