Re: [dmarc-ietf] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-12: (with COMMENT)

Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 19 April 2021 18:03 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A747A3A3D07; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 11:03:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.196
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.196 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8drDcO5chvPG; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 11:03:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x135.google.com (mail-il1-x135.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::135]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73CFC3A3D03; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 11:03:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x135.google.com with SMTP id l9so1427716ilh.10; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 11:03:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Gy8STftYmJGJLQsbPpUWZoMPs/hJHsZ4s940Oypsik0=; b=Xt651ODK/Fmo++D1t6H3tCB4H4CrtvqfLu6OT+Q+EMsUcivm8zueNHZUGsR4gATLfe XG+S6gtxh00bUjmhea8UJteOXn1E3rZvUfwUJ7Xnc0Xz0ZcxGdnEeh53Vd5mQ3CXsDjC /Yt/xeR+PaXSnZG3YUrHecgvL9yAMY5nbMGnI2UxGTgbFhvuwQqo47SCsYSRps9z532J Pz1wmp5sODyTOcaDlsnq05dW4fZXkJWGhClsh5xuuU6q88vOIbLYi0365TDxFgVVTYa9 TMb4TVIivkyCloMtXjp8AqKk+y4ptduyytGXxKrgkS6fXx2qp9okJl9JEfhTIyeYGTlL 3Now==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Gy8STftYmJGJLQsbPpUWZoMPs/hJHsZ4s940Oypsik0=; b=P6d18Cgkmii/1wL5dG/6HcpSJF8Bf6lF1C4xttL36SPxh8KLKoWn0+HVw3VARIRZH8 Y9usIR0XgqXEnTAmHvn1Fl3L4TN/vftIuT5PJG920vQxDbqRdP7NH4Hq9kKkt8yfdUjk S+tYgX79tizCzQngXTR7hA7Q6rmZ5ijjm+u0kQBVY/raFeSCfnK56z8krlUTcmamcXb8 BhNId9zp0TVaOzxOMz97/GdNStJhXvy7JvLADbpk1/ED4X5B3UE587ORCQlwG7JiwbTs ZN55UNLCv6bubQu6qnf2PRZIiR9SLQnTbZUGaTFmJluiUSqyIWOAiiYfu9eKUHdm+WML DeuA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531D3OOEhtG5HmioljUHBm1LHVPMBxuTP2uA9aEUaqav2K9/Ofc6 dCF/RpQSzSJjE7J7SQiV8mfqSDOg4lrA+XxpJJA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx9pnKdGokSxWda/wR/nqwk0NqDRez7QyrYeIt5QEpiYQt7PQU6QPGgL7xFeBigixISjw3iS0jdm4BXNHH26i0=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:ce0e:: with SMTP id b14mr18306781ilo.283.1618855399534; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 11:03:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <161847105823.12240.11886353486421150693@ietfa.amsl.com> <CADyWQ+HRSkOMvi2N5=q-pBiXGWGtfZXW+fjN5x5LqVq6LLeKdA@mail.gmail.com> <C098F99C-A00C-4663-8B0F-B5A4FC68BD16@cisco.com> <CADyWQ+GDQjMUzhv4+6tJ-1HSOamSRF07g3=+PiFiCwAx-NU35g@mail.gmail.com> <747DD7A5-9B91-48DF-8E19-8BEF36608310@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <747DD7A5-9B91-48DF-8E19-8BEF36608310@cisco.com>
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 14:03:08 -0400
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+FHXrDkw8WpGC05R11ZbF9wjrqG4oecMbtRGToqgmJkHQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-dmarc-psd@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dmarc-psd@ietf.org>, "dmarc-chairs@ietf.org" <dmarc-chairs@ietf.org>, IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000008355f05c0572524"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/sdGZkKDDNW4ITgQDdtTBEyt0w2c>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] =?utf-8?q?=C3=89ric_Vyncke=27s_No_Objection_on_draf?= =?utf-8?q?t-ietf-dmarc-psd-12=3A_=28with_COMMENT=29?=
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 18:03:28 -0000

Eric

I agree that a section with one subsection is a bit too much.
I'll add my text and see how it all looks.

tim


On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 1:27 PM Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyncke@cisco.com>
wrote:

> Tim,
>
>
>
> Why not ?
>
>
>
> Or even going simpler and removing the sub-section title (keeping the text
> of course)
>
>
>
> As you can guess, this is purely cosmetic, so, feel free to ignore my
> suggestion
>
>
>
> Kind regards
>
>
>
> -éric
>
>
>
> *From: *Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
> *Date: *Monday, 19 April 2021 at 17:36
> *To: *Eric Vyncke <evyncke@cisco.com>
> *Cc: *The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>rg>, "draft-ietf-dmarc-psd@ietf.org" <
> draft-ietf-dmarc-psd@ietf.org>gt;, "dmarc-chairs@ietf.org" <
> dmarc-chairs@ietf.org>gt;, IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>rg>, Alexey Melnikov <
> alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
> *Subject: *Re: Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-12:
> (with COMMENT)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 1:43 AM Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyncke@cisco.com>
> wrote:
>
> Tim,
>
>
>
> Thank you for your quick reply and the updates to the document.
>
>
>
> My comment on section 5.1 was actually on section 4.1 ... Sorry about the
> mix, I should drink more coffee it seems :-o
>
>
>
>
>
> Ahh, I see what you are referring to.  I think it was written as a
> subsection with the thought of adding this
>
> section to the Privacy Considerations section of the DMARC-bis document.
>  Perhaps some wording to reflect this?
>
> "If this experiment is successful, this section should be incorporated
> into the Privacy Considerations section
>
> of DMARC-bis" ?
>
>
>
> tim
>
>
>
>
>