Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing last call for draft-ietf-dmarc-eaiauth-00
Seth Blank <seth@sethblank.com> Mon, 21 January 2019 20:11 UTC
Return-Path: <seth@sethblank.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F615126BED for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 12:11:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.042
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.042 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.142, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sethblank-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VQdcPcS42UZI for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 12:11:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi1-x22d.google.com (mail-oi1-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C96A128766 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 12:11:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi1-x22d.google.com with SMTP id y1so15507655oie.12 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 12:11:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sethblank-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=tIvvhm+I0vGDC9TcVFT7WQMCSje/XvfZCpo4Jk5DVhM=; b=zfUlISJRKinY9iqlstapSzoaq0KIv7eOa/NdZ/JE2EHn6w+s99PlGIrlABBGiZ/aW0 tWeZpi8iveP7Ml9uW7C/JvVCcUI1gsGbBeMduEDhDmtexc0lDX0AgHY6IFXpMh9MI9uz mILRxFjAh7Tb0BW3+1ECsUjnSZf5f+TK7pjprIiVZYGnB3uTYqDd/M999lA6VH9AUkuo DJh79t+m+pURXKLoup+MdYUOj6CxmIU5WRxWycu+i2yUP5Z4iw14DbKMVMfoLmtHa5L9 BTZfa5Ohz+vl3ZjSA1zJE10SFOQnMzcLmeZveNkNOcSs0kYPKjy1Ovh44tS9WidSqry5 SPsw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=tIvvhm+I0vGDC9TcVFT7WQMCSje/XvfZCpo4Jk5DVhM=; b=aDfJ+G9/4rF/F84DPnoYOB++s4/YFpx2MAqBoNpAYR5HTIxWlsq0+qz475XZcD7BFE CcJidzQbLLfnHmsNjOgaD1gmAqRb00DDoIZF2va+Txhuje0BCB6HiJqMW2CiVxrsD0yV Q4DIyWdhes0kZSRmVOl3Dg0Y3UrBmgT7IW7PsMjAtrzz4VO6plxqx+Yj2xuv5aEcyImz QYJVF74KFRbnYKYa0xDMxl2XMDB6T8dwKcYQ4LOZAyyZ0oNJYrMM/zuEiqiy6Iv9dmCe n6epVbrlBVZf0tj1l7N7p9cOzl29DolS3kL/K89oyJCY14pQvPGV+fR4zzvLxyJyQGZL 1btQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukeRBeGaKTlxNGZFSXjB2d40+e2Eg8xtSsGqb+vcIqsqCNRQXJZJ RTczfm8l+DccUXzvY3wKLpjWXLKoyx374yYRVMFUdL6K
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN4nlHjgrbb7sCZDbPtjgb5XQ/1HumjW0Z0327meil+pydNmRF/5kUdxPVY93gMyTYnP8s7xQdOPWDjO/DEW5kQ=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:c682:: with SMTP id w124mr6697503oif.319.1548101467092; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 12:11:07 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CABuGu1rwpL-8vRiAwE2YKJBMgqPzZhkkrrYuGWhPOFpD0VoykQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAErFxE=1A=Y_MMJcG4BM+ptvR63fgWMLvMVFgRj4CxARG05t0Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAErFxE=1A=Y_MMJcG4BM+ptvR63fgWMLvMVFgRj4CxARG05t0Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Seth Blank <seth@sethblank.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 12:10:55 -0800
Message-ID: <CAD2i3WNANQXm11XQXxfZXaF=PXszh7y=ES_XDhWR+aj4ZbZHKA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "dmarc@ietf.org" <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000005d27a057ffd7680"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/tyjEkghzhL2rt3jGeH2rmuiXcXQ>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing last call for draft-ietf-dmarc-eaiauth-00
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 20:11:13 -0000
+1 I concur it’s time for last call On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 10:07 Peter M. Goldstein < peter.m.goldstein@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > I think it should be submitted for last call. > > Best, > > Peter > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 9:39 AM Kurt Andersen (b) <kboth@drkurt.com> > wrote: > >> Since we've had no controversy or concerns expressed regarding John's >> document (draft-ietf-dmarc-eaiauth-00 >> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmarc-eaiauth/>), do people >> feel that it is ready for last call? >> >> --Kurt >> _______________________________________________ >> dmarc mailing list >> dmarc@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc >> > _______________________________________________ > dmarc mailing list > dmarc@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc >
- [dmarc-ietf] Proposing last call for draft-ietf-d… Kurt Andersen (b)
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing last call for draft-ie… Peter M. Goldstein
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing last call for draft-ie… Seth Blank