Re: [DMM] Warren Kumari's Discuss on draft-ietf-dmm-mag-multihoming-04: (with DISCUSS)
"Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" <sgundave@cisco.com> Wed, 16 August 2017 00:03 UTC
Return-Path: <sgundave@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E298C1323B9; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 17:03:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.52
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.52 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2fg4JZTU4bE5; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 17:03:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A98761323AC; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 17:03:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=6156; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1502841817; x=1504051417; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=s2jov7AIh5FkOlgXoaJGDyI2kRmDG8e4kh/41bEgxD0=; b=lcFyX4EYCtqdOGHWtJBDfE0+h2qcjlfRxfpJDTbXQ3RgvszZ1Z7s4ZQ9 D4TyVCdEiufhcHbpk2On2bJTe2NzzZQ9yOtKtOGLYD1jPITLiVW6UR4uF oD0YU5sSvCBiBfyXStP2BYKQAigwW926yPC9XFgET3mpN3IythF7si5sH k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CaAACUi5NZ/4oNJK1eGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBg1pkgRUHjguQEYFuiDeNYQ6CBCyFGwKENj8YAQIBAQEBAQEBayiFGQEFeRACAQgYLiERJQIEAQ0FG4l8AxUQrnWHRA2EGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARgFgyiCAoFMgWODJ4JXgWkBEgFLBoVCBYl7h2COJjwCh1GDVIQjhHaCD4Vfg3uGcIw1iWIBHzh/C3cVhWAcGYFOdgGHT4EjgQ8BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.41,380,1498521600"; d="scan'208";a="65170046"
Received: from alln-core-5.cisco.com ([173.36.13.138]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 16 Aug 2017 00:03:36 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-010.cisco.com (xch-aln-010.cisco.com [173.36.7.20]) by alln-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v7G03a3U014802 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 16 Aug 2017 00:03:36 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-008.cisco.com (173.36.7.18) by XCH-ALN-010.cisco.com (173.36.7.20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:03:35 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-008.cisco.com ([173.36.7.18]) by XCH-ALN-008.cisco.com ([173.36.7.18]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:03:35 -0500
From: "Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" <sgundave@cisco.com>
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>, "pierrick.seite@orange.com" <pierrick.seite@orange.com>
CC: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-dmm-mag-multihoming@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dmm-mag-multihoming@ietf.org>, Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>, "dmm-chairs@ietf.org" <dmm-chairs@ietf.org>, "dmm@ietf.org" <dmm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: RE : Warren Kumari's Discuss on draft-ietf-dmm-mag-multihoming-04: (with DISCUSS)
Thread-Index: AQHTFiMa5HaWVPV3GUm7h+7dw60DEQ==
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 00:03:35 +0000
Message-ID: <D5B8D9FE.2875C2%sgundave@cisco.com>
References: <12323_1501708737_598241C1_12323_28_1_p123omkxf24p6fskvw4pi68k.1501708734898@email.android.com> <CAHw9_i+1Am7aSMAzrj9ctKCiLjDnb96Khn_LvTOveCN=Y6+g9g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_i+1Am7aSMAzrj9ctKCiLjDnb96Khn_LvTOveCN=Y6+g9g@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.7.1.161129
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.20.188.62]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <9AC535457189A043BC34314E81A27D27@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmm/0yOPmB_KWnlYtfYTf11qxuHMkog>
Subject: Re: [DMM] Warren Kumari's Discuss on draft-ietf-dmm-mag-multihoming-04: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: dmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distributed Mobility Management Working Group <dmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmm/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 00:03:41 -0000
Hi Warren, We will post the text by tomorrow. Regards Sri On 8/15/17, 10:46 AM, "Warren Kumari" <warren@kumari.net> wrote: >This document is on Thursday's telechat - I have not seen proposed >text to address my concerns, and so I'm continuing to hold my DISCUSS >position. > >W > >On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 5:18 PM, <pierrick.seite@orange.com> wrote: >> Hello >> >> Please see inline >> >> Pierrick >> >> >> >> Sent from my cell phone, mind the typos. >> >> -------- Message d'origine -------- >> De : Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> >> Date : 02/08/2017 22:23 (GMT+01:00) >> À : The IESG <iesg@ietf.org> >> Cc : draft-ietf-dmm-mag-multihoming@ietf.org, Jouni Korhonen >> <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>, dmm-chairs@ietf.org, jouni.nospam@gmail.com, >> dmm@ietf.org >> Objet : Warren Kumari's Discuss on draft-ietf-dmm-mag-multihoming-04: >>(with >> DISCUSS) >> >> Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for >> draft-ietf-dmm-mag-multihoming-04: Discuss >> >> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all >> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this >> introductory paragraph, however.) >> >> >> Please refer to >>https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html >> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. >> >> >> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmm-mag-multihoming/ >> >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> DISCUSS: >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Section 3.2. Traffic distribution schemes >> "Per-packet management: the LMA and the MAG distribute packets, >>belonging to >> a >> same IP flow, over more than one bindings (i.e. more than one WAN >> interface)." >> This immediately made my out-of-order-packets antenna pop up, so I read >>the >> section looking for mitigations. The very next sentence reads: "Packet >> distribution can be done either at the transport level, e.g. using >>MPTCP or >> at >> When operating at the IP packet level, different packets distribution >> algorithms are possible. " -- the fact that this sentence is a: >>malformed >> and >> b: hand-wavy did nothing to allay my concerns, so I read further: "The >> distribution algorithm is left to implementer but whatever the >>algorithm is, >> packets distribution likely introduces packet latency and out-of-order >> delivery. LMA and MAG shall thus be able to make reordering before >>packets >> delivery." - I agree with the first sentence (although it is poorly >>worded), >> but the second sentence doesn't follow from the first; "shall thus be >>able >> to" >> implies that the prior text somehow provides a solution, not points out >>a >> problem (the sentence is also malformed)-- I think you mean something >>like >> "The >> LMA and MAG thus need to be able reorder packets to their original order >> before >> delivery." >> >> This then continues with "Sequence number can be can be used for that >> purpose, >> for example using GRE with sequence number option [RFC5845]." - I think >>that >> the actual reference should be RFC2890, but regardless of this, I don't >> think >> that what you are proposing works - "The Sequence Number field is used >>to >> maintain sequence of packets **within** the GRE Tunnel." (from RFC2890, >> emphasis added). This means that sequence numbers are local to the >>tunnel, >> and >> (as I understand it) your solution involves diverse tunnels. Further, >> Section >> 2.2. Sequence Number says: "The receiver may perform a small amount of >> buffering in an attempt to recover the original sequence of transmitted >> packets. In this case, the packet may be placed in a buffer sorted by >> sequence >> number." - if you are proposing using a single sequence number space for >> multiple tunnels, you will end up with sequence number space gabs, and >>lots >> of >> buffering, etc. The section ends with: "However, more detailed >> considerations >> on reordering and IP packet distribution scheme (e.g. definition of >>packets >> distribution algorithm) are out the scope of this document." - I think >>that, >> unless the prior paragraph is significantly reworked, it should not try >>and >> suggest any mitigations. >> >>>> ok >> >> The whole idea of striping packets of a flow across (notably) different >> transports seems like a really bad idea to me -- is it actually needed? >> >>>> some use-cases implement per-packet distribution. However this >>>>document >>>> does not aim to make recommendation on the way to distribute packets >> >> >> >>_________________________________________________________________________ >>________________________________________________ >> >> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations >> confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc >> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez >>recu >> ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler >> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages >> electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, >> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme >>ou >> falsifie. Merci. >> >> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged >> information that may be protected by law; >> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. >> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and >> delete this message and its attachments. >> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have >>been >> modified, changed or falsified. >> Thank you. > > > >-- >I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad >idea in the first place. >This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing >regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair >of pants. > ---maf
- [DMM] Warren Kumari's Discuss on draft-ietf-dmm-m… Warren Kumari
- Re: [DMM] Warren Kumari's Discuss on draft-ietf-d… pierrick.seite
- Re: [DMM] Warren Kumari's Discuss on draft-ietf-d… Warren Kumari
- Re: [DMM] Warren Kumari's Discuss on draft-ietf-d… pierrick.seite
- Re: [DMM] Warren Kumari's Discuss on draft-ietf-d… Warren Kumari
- Re: [DMM] Warren Kumari's Discuss on draft-ietf-d… Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)
- Re: [DMM] Warren Kumari's Discuss on draft-ietf-d… Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)
- Re: [DMM] Warren Kumari's Discuss on draft-ietf-d… Warren Kumari