Re: [DMM] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-dmm-mag-multihoming-04: (with COMMENT)
Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Thu, 03 August 2017 15:38 UTC
Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B042132481; Thu, 3 Aug 2017 08:38:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.881
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.881 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qivjzBi2_TEL; Thu, 3 Aug 2017 08:38:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F148A132488; Thu, 3 Aug 2017 08:38:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.63] (cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v73FcWJs089974 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 3 Aug 2017 10:38:33 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22] claimed to be [10.0.1.63]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <81C77F07008CA24F9783A98CFD706F713AA912BB@OPEXCLILM22.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2017 10:38:32 -0500
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-dmm-mag-multihoming@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dmm-mag-multihoming@ietf.org>, Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>, "dmm-chairs@ietf.org" <dmm-chairs@ietf.org>, "dmm@ietf.org" <dmm@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D5A643CC-8122-4382-B126-EDCFC9AF9BFA@nostrum.com>
References: <150171204983.5743.7998947846703116776.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <81C77F07008CA24F9783A98CFD706F713AA912BB@OPEXCLILM22.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
To: pierrick.seite@orange.com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmm/6TsLyjWX_fj8hEapN1jwhe5MvnQ>
Subject: Re: [DMM] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-dmm-mag-multihoming-04: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distributed Mobility Management Working Group <dmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmm/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2017 15:38:38 -0000
Thanks, your response resolves all my comments. Ben. > On Aug 3, 2017, at 3:30 AM, pierrick.seite@orange.com wrote: > > > >> -----Message d'origine----- >> De : Ben Campbell [mailto:ben@nostrum.com] >> Envoyé : jeudi 3 août 2017 00:14 >> À : The IESG >> Cc : draft-ietf-dmm-mag-multihoming@ietf.org; Jouni Korhonen; dmm- >> chairs@ietf.org; jouni.nospam@gmail.com; dmm@ietf.org >> Objet : Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-dmm-mag-multihoming-04: (with >> COMMENT) >> >> Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for >> draft-ietf-dmm-mag-multihoming-04: No Objection >> >> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email >> addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory >> paragraph, however.) >> >> >> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html >> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. >> >> >> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmm-mag-multihoming/ >> >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> COMMENT: >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> I have a few editorial comments/nits: >> >> - There are several acronyms that should be expanded on first mention. >> (including at least a couple that are expanded on _second_ mention (MAG and >> LMA). >> >> - 3.2, "Per-packet management" bullet: The second sentence does not make >> sense. >> > > This sentence will be removed > >> - 3.2, last paragraph: Are we really talking about the latency introduced by per- >> packet management, or jitter (i.e. variation in latency)? >> > > We are talking about jitter. It will be clarified in next release. > >> - 4.1, definition of "Interface Label": This doesn't really define the term "interface >> label". It talks about how it is used, but not what it represents. >> > > You're right... We will add definition of interface label in the terminology section.
- [DMM] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-d… Ben Campbell
- Re: [DMM] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ie… pierrick.seite
- Re: [DMM] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ie… Ben Campbell