IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DMM] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-dmm-mag-multihoming-04: (with COMMENT)

<pierrick.seite@orange.com> Thu, 03 August 2017 08:30 UTC

Return-Path: <pierrick.seite@orange.com>
X-Original-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76C05132324; Thu, 3 Aug 2017 01:30:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.62
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.62 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PR0aW0lkek5W; Thu, 3 Aug 2017 01:30:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.orange.com (mta240.mail.business.static.orange.com [80.12.66.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF7DF131D25; Thu, 3 Aug 2017 01:30:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from opfedar01.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.2]) by opfedar20.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 4DF7F1203DD; Thu, 3 Aug 2017 10:30:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme2.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.31.72]) by opfedar01.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 29D3B160088; Thu, 3 Aug 2017 10:30:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from OPEXCLILM22.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::8c90:f4e9:be28:2a1]) by OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::60a9:abc3:86e6:2541%19]) with mapi id 14.03.0352.000; Thu, 3 Aug 2017 10:30:54 +0200
From: pierrick.seite@orange.com
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-dmm-mag-multihoming@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dmm-mag-multihoming@ietf.org>, Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>, "dmm-chairs@ietf.org" <dmm-chairs@ietf.org>, "jouni.nospam@gmail.com" <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>, "dmm@ietf.org" <dmm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-dmm-mag-multihoming-04: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHTC9ytcOq9fw96OEyswCAb38l3DaJyS6NQ
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2017 08:30:54 +0000
Message-ID: <81C77F07008CA24F9783A98CFD706F713AA912BB@OPEXCLILM22.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <150171204983.5743.7998947846703116776.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <150171204983.5743.7998947846703116776.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.168.234.1]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg="SHA1"; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_001A_01D30C43.953C8570"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmm/x-mVwZyyrpKe0bz0h9ieh7ea2LU>
Subject: Re: [DMM] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-dmm-mag-multihoming-04: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distributed Mobility Management Working Group <dmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmm/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2017 08:30:59 -0000


> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Ben Campbell [mailto:ben@nostrum.com]
> Envoyé : jeudi 3 août 2017 00:14
> À : The IESG
> Cc : draft-ietf-dmm-mag-multihoming@ietf.org; Jouni Korhonen; dmm-
> chairs@ietf.org; jouni.nospam@gmail.com; dmm@ietf.org
> Objet : Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-dmm-mag-multihoming-04: (with
> COMMENT)
> 
> Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-dmm-mag-multihoming-04: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email
> addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory
> paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmm-mag-multihoming/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> I have a few editorial comments/nits:
> 
> - There are several acronyms that should be expanded on first mention.
> (including at least a couple that are expanded on _second_ mention (MAG and
> LMA).
> 
> - 3.2, "Per-packet management" bullet: The second sentence does not make
> sense.
> 

This sentence will be removed

> - 3.2, last paragraph: Are we really talking about the latency introduced by per-
> packet management, or jitter (i.e. variation in latency)?
> 

We are talking about jitter. It will be clarified in next release.

> - 4.1, definition of "Interface Label": This doesn't really define the term "interface
> label". It talks about how it is used, but not what it represents.
> 

You're right... We will add definition of interface label in the terminology section.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email