IETF Logo Mail Archive

[DMM] draft-hmm-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis

Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com> Thu, 29 November 2018 15:52 UTC

Return-Path: <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A664130E0E for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 07:52:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5gEOXwYvc4gV for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 07:52:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm1-x32b.google.com (mail-wm1-x32b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C87EC1271FF for <dmm@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 07:52:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm1-x32b.google.com with SMTP id k198so2747299wmd.3 for <dmm@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 07:52:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=bLlpQpM/T/K8V8mZsaSStKciOLFOPFQlHqHmeLe1rBI=; b=shPq7d1/4KMeafmx+/cy3V/LfaW6RYDEAdCrXYMeY6g1k8XUsKAeXqt2B9nCRUZ4I9 AgKWrdTtRrSIRyVzXf1W/CHGH1fovKU6hlyWt5JO3vwNxW/IUVJmXZDuWrwr8yWXl72c T3XWHek4UX116cgiGUMYw8vB5ydCgNKQLf8SUsEN5TiXxO//LyqhsRKBioFTMb7eiq8r shFLkTpp2f7mYoYRSdQkNkTd/4Elqp6ueibED4K7r7x1Ju3UgehfYW3Dlm/VGI5IMVpG c7ser6MGTeXZALBycnPWKz9GGBiidHgcstIgdbJ9WdwhwKV9FVJVITU/9BmJT38UGa90 UKPQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:reply-to:from:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=bLlpQpM/T/K8V8mZsaSStKciOLFOPFQlHqHmeLe1rBI=; b=BhqCVjvamHX4mdK1WPpXj9ctXAMpTIGbepOHlYaVw+2P1b2eWElX+aapgGe0h1ENa3 fCXynObfa+KnaIpb0GXFD8H+I5nIARXhZwNTipTpHsl9jN3/zEdOJhpiowz3ZWwuldXJ lTmPsTY1350JEwZa3J2Rwb+0otIrQerXirZa6BtCDl/Xiw309RlVrycgpxz8Z36LIpw3 bEHaVDAf3xZGf5ckFK2TrY/2ih45pOiGydzfR3H/ljyTMvG2WbZu1vTOjJJ3vSlcksov FkKr07Vs/SkBhvQT5I9rgYxOd1r+p7Rio/xIKjejvNU58+3lmzlSgjYowTaDS+VaoFD1 oe6g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWYWf0GOnHRxM7V8m/nVmJcOp+ATzlGJ+i42WIl/Zx+Yn73+k61S zp5oMjQfXz+S6xXSSkR+Agpnvv3QieLK6Y5TaIy2RTX8
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/W2OgsPd/1tyih5ZM/MtCLp8Mk9Qf35IoBHFfKg1+Bf8PunckDPuJOjU3QLC5fxdea6FEa8//PH2hJB1PecxHU=
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:a4c3:: with SMTP id n186mr2152195wme.89.1543506731984; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 07:52:11 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: sarikaya@ieee.org
From: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 09:52:00 -0600
Message-ID: <CAC8QAcd1LdNifUpO-ht+e9ydZfMHduzCLdqrSRFihLZ49=jnaQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: dmm <dmm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000077ef10057bcfaaa0"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmm/DxsbwfjUBcFWAcK9MpinwwyEmOo>
Subject: [DMM] draft-hmm-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis
X-BeenThere: dmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distributed Mobility Management Working Group <dmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmm/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 15:52:15 -0000

Hi all,
>From the link Dave Allan provided, here I copy the content of CT4 liaison.
There is a claim that this draft is not for 3GPP but for IETF. However if
you read the liaison, it was originally submitted to CT4.
I think this liaison is show stopper, again sorry to say that.

Here is the liaison:
CT4 reviewed the IETF draft-hmm-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis-00 based on the input
discussion paper submitted to CT4 in C4-185292. CT4 thanks IETF DMM for
their
analysis. CT4 would like to provide the following initial feedback on the
same.
CT4 intends to do further analysis and provide any additional feedback, if
any,
in future. CT4 would like to emphasize that the evaluation criteria for the
user plane protocol study (FS_UPPS) in 5GC shall be defined by 3GPP CT4 and
the
work has just now started in 3GPP.


Regards,
Behcet

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email