IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DMM] draft-hmm-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis

Arashmid Akhavain <arashmid.akhavain@huawei.com> Thu, 29 November 2018 16:49 UTC

Return-Path: <arashmid.akhavain@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E23F130E5C for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 08:49:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JJNz0alWFgSv for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 08:49:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8CD4130E4D for <dmm@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 08:49:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhreml705-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id B0BB83C183CD0 for <dmm@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 16:49:20 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from YYZEML702-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.218.33.72) by lhreml705-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.46) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 16:49:21 +0000
Received: from YYZEML704-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.114]) by YYZEML702-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.6.105]) with mapi id 14.03.0399.000; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 11:49:20 -0500
From: Arashmid Akhavain <arashmid.akhavain@huawei.com>
To: "sarikaya@ieee.org" <sarikaya@ieee.org>, dmm <dmm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [DMM] draft-hmm-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis
Thread-Index: AQHUh/uPV+flLU1N+USk2hmDktDw5aVm9jcg
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 16:49:19 +0000
Message-ID: <D57109449177B54F8B9C093953AC5BCD75A44D6C@yyzeml704-chm.china.huawei.com>
References: <CAC8QAcd1LdNifUpO-ht+e9ydZfMHduzCLdqrSRFihLZ49=jnaQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAC8QAcd1LdNifUpO-ht+e9ydZfMHduzCLdqrSRFihLZ49=jnaQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.193.61.47]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D57109449177B54F8B9C093953AC5BCD75A44D6Cyyzeml704chmchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmm/SCd0rAXtBFsl0BnCyONWS-N3n5U>
Subject: Re: [DMM] draft-hmm-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis
X-BeenThere: dmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distributed Mobility Management Working Group <dmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmm/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 16:49:34 -0000

3GPP will decide on what works for them. IETF decides what works and gets adopted in IETF.


Arashmid

From: dmm [mailto:dmm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Behcet Sarikaya
Sent: 29 November 2018 10:52
To: dmm <dmm@ietf.org>
Subject: [DMM] draft-hmm-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis


Hi all,
From the link Dave Allan provided, here I copy the content of CT4 liaison. There is a claim that this draft is not for 3GPP but for IETF. However if you read the liaison, it was originally submitted to CT4.
I think this liaison is show stopper, again sorry to say that.

Here is the liaison:
CT4 reviewed the IETF draft-hmm-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis-00 based on the input
discussion paper submitted to CT4 in C4-185292. CT4 thanks IETF DMM for their
analysis. CT4 would like to provide the following initial feedback on the same.
CT4 intends to do further analysis and provide any additional feedback, if any,
in future. CT4 would like to emphasize that the evaluation criteria for the
user plane protocol study (FS_UPPS) in 5GC shall be defined by 3GPP CT4 and the
work has just now started in 3GPP.


Regards,
Behcet

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email