Re: [DMM] Change "Port" to ? [ was Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-fpc-cpdp-05.txt]

Satoru Matsushima <satoru.matsushima@gmail.com> Mon, 06 February 2017 07:20 UTC

Return-Path: <satoru.matsushima@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D58E129C90 for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Feb 2017 23:20:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Yjw-4Gn9j1Ct for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Feb 2017 23:20:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg0-x242.google.com (mail-pg0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A0C7129488 for <dmm@ietf.org>; Sun, 5 Feb 2017 23:20:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg0-x242.google.com with SMTP id 194so8366317pgd.0 for <dmm@ietf.org>; Sun, 05 Feb 2017 23:20:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=qa7Yiw8CwHXZL7Q+OwwVtHddmzxK+nW7Me6uW0aLR6k=; b=LazxEdrtUETPrgBQ3zjO4p8JsfIBtGIRzGcZfVLGQMkcwxmxzR2f1V2P646FxIKoWB g5Os7895qbIwIN49U9+3Wpc57LzkpYpByeRbZGqr8Xp0MBlNDFR2aCFnD9xhmPEXKNln CmEf7VjetpUqI7H6KwJC9RfLlnAcmHgTt04Mpb+yUhWElwYxFvY8+ma0nzq4XLLTzVwc GNdd7HmObf/4Trg55ZRF8ntwWRsHZyU5pAjoZjLR8+Es0/tU4NiUV98+HMX1m6eYZvqT orvsgKrpL9+2+3x4HsQaE2l1Z5EugQFQWdJZ+YZIn4YzciNtb8V+9MNgFtW0nnemym1b adwg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=qa7Yiw8CwHXZL7Q+OwwVtHddmzxK+nW7Me6uW0aLR6k=; b=tW7/60Za/I37XdD5DllXesKpWCbS6+qabT1waJjpoL3NY4FK9Yy+8SB9R0vuJ8RGBi PnnkQLS/1OWuLMI3C7dOg7gNPkbcNpBdUvueO1GCyux/3SHiKJXQilpiH6LAMfFTU1iX xN7rHBZOGIC3MFjGKzxRXOztFe+Tv9gnyAa94oV2IrayRWkJUoX4T73oWDzr2tcZTcGK izf6dSIgORBqFrRcfrjGT28hbBNHj3vcOMwiWwAGlw4+59zylE5p9N46VbuSt1LnQ/Eu ds6PitQLQj3T145sf6MgD4sUvF4soxHwcFD3eucXQzxH+8CChYw4RQ/306O+5vgBisXc 6JEg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXJuvvqMq1TRX9LoCusmQ/vsJvv7DJxw1eCBXt7anlZuuazLkXKCP+ewNyzoFGvh2A==
X-Received: by 10.84.169.67 with SMTP id g61mr15524743plb.137.1486365629708; Sun, 05 Feb 2017 23:20:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.207.114.107] ([202.45.12.164]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a1sm24552146pgc.14.2017.02.05.23.20.27 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 05 Feb 2017 23:20:28 -0800 (PST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
From: Satoru Matsushima <satoru.matsushima@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <116dd8b8-ac89-5e9b-1c3e-eb92371b8f98@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2017 16:20:25 +0900
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <041B7084-FA37-4C3F-8F72-D07E9948E080@gmail.com>
References: <147793286841.32501.6238148222555288408.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <715d6603-f939-7d21-b6ae-b1a7e435b8d2@earthlink.net> <D5DA65A5-1648-498A-9EE5-E9737255B28F@gmail.com> <69756203DDDDE64E987BC4F70B71A26DAF06C624@PALLENE.office.hd> <116dd8b8-ac89-5e9b-1c3e-eb92371b8f98@earthlink.net>
To: Charlie Perkins <charles.perkins@earthlink.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmm/IH5FsXwdxmchTV24fcItE3C5wik>
Cc: "dmm@ietf.org" <dmm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DMM] Change "Port" to ? [ was Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-fpc-cpdp-05.txt]
X-BeenThere: dmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distributed Mobility Management Working Group <dmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmm/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2017 07:20:31 -0000

+1
--satoru

> 2017/01/26 2:16、Charlie Perkins <charles.perkins@earthlink.net> のメール:
> 
> Hello Marco,
> 
> What would you think about replacing the term "port" by "virtual port", which would usually be shortened to "vport" (or "Vport")?
> 
> I think it would have several benefits:
> 
> 	• it seems intuitively appealing, at least to me
> 	• it avoids the unacceptable clash with the traditional meanings of the word "port"
> 	• it fits well with my understanding of "data-plane node" and "context".
> 	• it's a relatively easy editorial change to the draft
> Regards,
> Charlie P.
>