[DMM] [Errata Verified] RFC6275 (5695)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Fri, 12 January 2024 10:52 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D20D8C14F6AA; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 02:52:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.659
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.659 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id snjLQPgQuj2N; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 02:52:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfcpa.amsl.com [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DADDC14F68C; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 02:52:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 95E481B27BAD; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 02:52:53 -0800 (PST)
To: brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com, charliep@computer.org, dbj@cs.rice.edu, jari.arkko@ericsson.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: evyncke@cisco.com, iesg@ietf.org, dmm@ietf.org, iana@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20240112105253.95E481B27BAD@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 02:52:53 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmm/N5mQgE7oH8GfmD8Eb84SB6AAEfE>
Subject: [DMM] [Errata Verified] RFC6275 (5695)
X-BeenThere: dmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distributed Mobility Management Working Group <dmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmm/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 10:52:57 -0000

The following errata report has been verified for RFC6275,
"Mobility Support in IPv6". 

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5695

--------------------------------------
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial

Reported by: Brian Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Date Reported: 2019-04-16
Verified by: Eric Vyncke (IESG)

Section: GLOBAL

Original Text
-------------
[none]

Corrected Text
--------------
Updates: 4302 [in RFC header]

Notes
-----
Section 11.3.2 says:
      The treatment of destination options described in RFC 4302 is
      extended as follows.  The AH authentication data MUST be
      calculated... [etc.]
This is a change to the AH algorithm and should be flagged as a formal update to RFC 4302.

-- Verifier note (EV) ----

Indeed, RFC 6275 should formally update RFC 4302. This erratum sits somewhere between editorial and technical, and as it does not change the technical content itself, I edited the type to 'editorial'.

--------------------------------------
RFC6275 (draft-ietf-mext-rfc3775bis-13)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Mobility Support in IPv6
Publication Date    : July 2011
Author(s)           : C. Perkins, Ed., D. Johnson, J. Arkko
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Mobility EXTensions for IPv6
Area                : Internet
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG