Re: [DMM] [Errata Verified] RFC6275 (5695)
Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Fri, 29 March 2024 19:24 UTC
Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52123C14F616; Fri, 29 Mar 2024 12:24:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FPm18eoVHtM8; Fri, 29 Mar 2024 12:24:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x633.google.com (mail-pl1-x633.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::633]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87F06C14F5FD; Fri, 29 Mar 2024 12:24:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x633.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1e2235c630aso10460275ad.2; Fri, 29 Mar 2024 12:24:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1711740276; x=1712345076; darn=ietf.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=si2cY7v415eQ9jXNewLFXzeaFWrqRVdoh/jxlV8922c=; b=kzL7Zm1wBuDx391g5Oc8XS/9MOTli6QbXDu9BeUYbI/0jEYXOVGVFSSTNcztGGppW6 cQMiS+9xcL8xKPLTy1ymR6otiSw4V19gJ+hwJnl1sUpkJlf49f+bRL+aaBAE41UlP1vo 26TFCDk1SPayE7vOpqJxWXA1MdtQI+ucgnaGD8ME3YR1Ci9hoP6Tey+XaDkCZnubszvm pMNQFX0R7Y5wTrHibRv8NDhVL7nC785cTXP0n7BCvAW+lABkFuYdV0OxiNNtQKy81kv/ VWOf9PENZ6XVNThxNZ2czkVReh2ydrOA+IrrYtHhEp8EWWrCTDYVc58NbGAEVv7kVBaE +02w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1711740276; x=1712345076; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=si2cY7v415eQ9jXNewLFXzeaFWrqRVdoh/jxlV8922c=; b=nmSZJocGo3zzvK/p9onO9MLp44yn3JRZgQiqtIZKA1REBc2ngeNTA0Ns5/4bs4w1wv TJth43vRQK7RcBj+XKs6af2QG2JWGeGC8cp3mtGZTvQG+UhqXIJ1ZamNxLSmUTvE1GYv W2jPqPHKWS9iZpe5/5e34vWEPpznKjnhNf+2Nclj04w2ilIq3NDiP53S/LkAOJvRNUOc lzY5/o9TMAdzYWGMR6E+IOZn1Aigw/XonjVZ663Kh4IdSGr66TOOHMJTYG4Ia93m5cGf ZMa2d0s1FUMinDCakDshj35tn4FFEREAZyu2/cfjL2bQ3y7TvLOpza2Kdph0gS1vfsB6 usng==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXBs1s49mgZm8SKBKOkX8fApM66Dmx22M7yrULIQWg9uiy8DZBNrBPG1QDhD2mPrrvd03EkrdDsBrH0TAtCCAedFpdOT8GS4KH2tdE=
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwnX98EHpj7zP9tXgMq4qVpaeVYQ4ZWmfM9SDEydc4cV/AXkEfg r0tpJErSo08eWawjX6OKdSQxSDF0PxBd8ejcIA7C325GJx8rpIWy
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE8O5BKHELMO1/qeKzyeeZhuWqWhSJu46PSdOHGTwIR6XpUbtq+o7JakoSfvWnV04Pa7jxZfQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:e843:b0:1e0:64bd:51ac with SMTP id t3-20020a170902e84300b001e064bd51acmr3779192plg.22.1711740275755; Fri, 29 Mar 2024 12:24:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPV6:2404:4400:541d:a600:44b7:2c2e:2bc6:8707? ([2404:4400:541d:a600:44b7:2c2e:2bc6:8707]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c4-20020a170902d90400b001e02d9c05d8sm3799882plz.103.2024.03.29.12.24.32 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 29 Mar 2024 12:24:35 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <ff2de7ed-0365-489b-9891-782932260db7@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2024 08:24:32 +1300
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, charliep@computer.org, dbj@cs.rice.edu, jari.arkko@ericsson.com
Cc: evyncke@cisco.com, iesg@ietf.org, dmm@ietf.org, iana@iana.org
References: <20240112105253.95E481B27BAD@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20240112105253.95E481B27BAD@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmm/srMLapONXOwoN7CTJTb-y2IigCI>
Subject: Re: [DMM] [Errata Verified] RFC6275 (5695)
X-BeenThere: dmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distributed Mobility Management Working Group <dmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmm/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 19:24:40 -0000
Hi,
I noticed today that the updates/updated metadata for RFC6275 and RFC4302 (in the RFC index etc.) have not been updated according to this verified errata report.
Regards
Brian Carpenter
On 12-Jan-24 23:52, RFC Errata System wrote:
> The following errata report has been verified for RFC6275,
> "Mobility Support in IPv6".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5695
>
> --------------------------------------
> Status: Verified
> Type: Editorial
>
> Reported by: Brian Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
> Date Reported: 2019-04-16
> Verified by: Eric Vyncke (IESG)
>
> Section: GLOBAL
>
> Original Text
> -------------
> [none]
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> Updates: 4302 [in RFC header]
>
> Notes
> -----
> Section 11.3.2 says:
> The treatment of destination options described in RFC 4302 is
> extended as follows. The AH authentication data MUST be
> calculated... [etc.]
> This is a change to the AH algorithm and should be flagged as a formal update to RFC 4302.
>
> -- Verifier note (EV) ----
>
> Indeed, RFC 6275 should formally update RFC 4302. This erratum sits somewhere between editorial and technical, and as it does not change the technical content itself, I edited the type to 'editorial'.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC6275 (draft-ietf-mext-rfc3775bis-13)
> --------------------------------------
> Title : Mobility Support in IPv6
> Publication Date : July 2011
> Author(s) : C. Perkins, Ed., D. Johnson, J. Arkko
> Category : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source : Mobility EXTensions for IPv6
> Area : Internet
> Stream : IETF
> Verifying Party : IESG
- [DMM] [Errata Verified] RFC6275 (5695) RFC Errata System
- Re: [DMM] [Errata Verified] RFC6275 (5695) Brian E Carpenter