Re: [DMM] Mirja_Kühlewind's_No_Objection_on_draft-ietf-dmm-hnprenum-06:_(with_COMMENT)
"Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Mon, 06 March 2017 09:14 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D960129624 for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 01:14:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pa8wxx1L2vpb for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 01:14:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kuehlewind.net (kuehlewind.net [83.169.45.111]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 229CF12961A for <dmm@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 01:14:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 17568 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2017 10:14:10 +0100
Received: from pd9e11f2b.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (HELO ?192.168.178.33?) (217.225.31.43) by kuehlewind.net with ESMTPSA (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted, authenticated); 6 Mar 2017 10:14:10 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
From: "Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
In-Reply-To: <201703061013174295521@cnnic.cn>
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 10:14:09 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <239215AB-D3E5-4113-9D8D-B9CA0408F623@kuehlewind.net>
References: <201703061013174295521@cnnic.cn>
To: "Z.W. Yan" <yan@cnnic.cn>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmm/k4-AIbG9C5jRSEfbNHQwn4pAh28>
Cc: draft-ietf-dmm-hnprenum <draft-ietf-dmm-hnprenum@ietf.org>, dmm-chairs <dmm-chairs@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, dmm <dmm@ietf.org>, "max.ldp" <max.ldp@alibaba-inc.com>
Subject: Re: [DMM] Mirja_Kühlewind's_No_Objection_on_draft-ietf-dmm-hnprenum-06:_(with_COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distributed Mobility Management Working Group <dmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmm/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 09:14:15 -0000
Hi, both changes look good to me. Mirja > Am 06.03.2017 um 03:13 schrieb Z.W. Yan <yan@cnnic.cn>: > > Hello, Mirja, > Thank you for the review and comments on this draft, please check my in-line responses below. > > > 2017-03-06 > Z.W. Yan > 发件人： Mirja_Kühlewind > 发送时间： 2017-03-01 02:08:21 > 收件人： The IESG > 抄送： draft-ietf-dmm-hnprenum; dmm-chairs; dmm; max.ldp > 主题： [DMM] Mirja_Kühlewind's_No_Objection_on_draft-ietf-dmm-hnprenum-06:_(with_COMMENT) > Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-dmm-hnprenum-06: No Objection > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmm-hnprenum/ > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > This document has a 2119 boilerplate but doesn't use normative language. > I think it would actually be good to use normative language! > Minor questions: > - secion 4: "This temporary binding should only be used for the downwards > packet transmission" > By downward you mean 'to the MN', right? > Why is this? Does that actually help in any scenario? > *** You are right, the presentaion "This temporary binding > should only be used for the downwards packet transmission and the LMA > should stop broadcasting the routing information about the old HNP if > the old HNP is no longer anchored at this LMA." may cause confusion and it will be revised as "And the LMA > MUST stop broadcasting the routing information about the old HNP if > the old HNP is no longer anchored at this LMA." > > - I'm not sure why section 3 is titled 'PMIPv6 Extensions'...? > *** Is "HNP Renumbering Procedure" better? > _______________________________________________ > dmm mailing list > dmm@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
- Re: [DMM] Mirja_Kühlewind's_No_Objection_on_draft… Z.W. Yan
- Re: [DMM] Mirja_Kühlewind's_No_Objection_on_draft… Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)