IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DMM] DMM WG Adoption Poll (1) for "Architecture Discussion on SRv6 Mobile User plane" - draft-kohno-dmm-srv6mob-arch-07

Weiqiang Cheng <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com> Mon, 30 October 2023 07:47 UTC

Return-Path: <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com>
X-Original-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2082C151531; Mon, 30 Oct 2023 00:47:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rSHlI_MJnRSP; Mon, 30 Oct 2023 00:46:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmccmta2.chinamobile.com (cmccmta2.chinamobile.com [221.176.66.80]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66E30C14CE3B; Mon, 30 Oct 2023 00:46:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[172.16.121.81]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app07-12007 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee7653f5f6480e-ff9ac; Mon, 30 Oct 2023 15:46:44 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee7653f5f6480e-ff9ac
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from chengweiqiang (unknown[10.2.52.106]) by rmsmtp-syy-appsvrnew01-12030 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2efe653f5f62650-19651; Mon, 30 Oct 2023 15:46:44 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2efe653f5f62650-19651
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2023 15:46:47 +0800
From: Weiqiang Cheng <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com>
To: Satoru Matsushima <satoru.matsushima@gmail.com>, dmm <dmm@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-kohno-dmm-srv6mob-arch <draft-kohno-dmm-srv6mob-arch@ietf.org>
References: <CAFwJXX76g3kK97j0VqyWNqj3wKLa2RzKo2zyS78qsa9HBsttyw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-GUID: 3719ECA3-C443-47E1-B5B6-5C91694699A2
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.2.25.213[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2023103015464756329712@chinamobile.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart501136185111_=----"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmm/vVVsgbezHrPY9Sz1LyjIUv6xbao>
Subject: Re: [DMM] DMM WG Adoption Poll (1) for "Architecture Discussion on SRv6 Mobile User plane" - draft-kohno-dmm-srv6mob-arch-07
X-BeenThere: dmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distributed Mobility Management Working Group <dmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmm/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2023 07:47:03 -0000

Hi,

I reviewed the draft and support adoption of it.

One minor comment:
One recurring concern from the Mobile guys is the perceived excessive length of the SRv6 packet header. I suggest adding a short section in the document highlighting compressed SID can effectively address this concern.

B.R.
Weiqiang Cheng

 
From: Satoru Matsushima
Date: 2023-10-19 17:41
To: dmm
CC: draft-kohno-dmm-srv6mob-arch
Subject: [DMM] DMM WG Adoption Poll (1) for "Architecture Discussion on SRv6 Mobile User plane" - draft-kohno-dmm-srv6mob-arch-07
Dear DMMers,

This email starts a two-weeks DMM WG adoption poll (1) for "Architecture Discussion on SRv6 Mobile User plane" - draft-kohno-dmm-srv6mob-arch-07.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kohno-dmm-srv6mob-arch/

Please review the draft and post any comments on this mail thread prior to Friday, November 3rd, 2023.

Regards,
Sri, Satoru

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email