[dns-at-ietf] Re: Discussion: big groups vs small, focused groups
Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Thu, 06 November 2025 14:47 UTC
Return-Path: <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Original-To: dns-at-ietf@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: dns-at-ietf@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2470D8463BE4 for <dns-at-ietf@mail2.ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Nov 2025 06:47:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=hardakers.net
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XCF8nQlJU2mC for <dns-at-ietf@mail2.ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Nov 2025 06:47:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.hardakers.net (mail.hardakers.net [107.220.113.177]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7A0F8463A61 for <dns-at-ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Nov 2025 06:46:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (rtr-guestwired.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.144.1]) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E0B6920ABC; Thu, 06 Nov 2025 06:46:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.hardakers.net E0B6920ABC
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hardakers.net; s=default; t=1762440417; bh=V/6stsvG/r3A6omk6O3/Fcd03obrl3P7lv+VlPEt2/0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=rVNzhSj5SQuC7oReemKx9KgxBSvuRDnD1Gz14LVVzey1K0iSU6YmwBNxKlgXQT/wz jaxnzj3HfloCGFJS631hWFEIFzTmToP/1JqIcP+BTld8wH1VzZyajDYL639FIWVlPN 63NKgQxbT5c9QGhGXGPKNELC/L7GNZ+86lP0p90w=
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: Petr Špaček <pspacek@isc.org>
In-Reply-To: <33a19d1f-d84b-414d-893c-ce316942e3bc@isc.org> ("Petr Špaček"'s message of "Thu, 6 Nov 2025 09:33:39 -0500")
References: <ybl5xci8pp7.fsf@wd.hardakers.net> <7C7F3527-766A-42CF-ABC7-D7F1B1609770@fugue.com> <1b1708ad-8e77-4194-9047-2fb6058b28cd@lear.ch> <yblo6q9639k.fsf@wd.hardakers.net> <c879ee9b-cf32-4480-a8d1-982cd8ae11e0@lear.ch> <ybl5xch628j.fsf@wd.hardakers.net> <61bcd7e8-0a5e-469b-8ba6-17690e4eebc8@lear.ch> <7286F00A-8085-4322-AE15-50CBD9791130@rfc1035.com> <197ac10c-0fc6-e29e-92aa-220cb8dc5516@nohats.ca> <f2cebc5e-2f52-4eca-acbf-54d9180bd8eb@isc.org> <ybl4ir7bc6g.fsf@wx.hardakers.net> <33a19d1f-d84b-414d-893c-ce316942e3bc@isc.org>
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2025 06:46:54 -0800
Message-ID: <ybl4ir79q1t.fsf@wx.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID-Hash: MJDGNUQIAQUWJ5R5ND2FKX4534P7NAQD
X-Message-ID-Hash: MJDGNUQIAQUWJ5R5ND2FKX4534P7NAQD
X-MailFrom: wjhns1@hardakers.net
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>, dns-at-ietf@ietf.org, Phil Regnauld <regnauld@dns-oarc.net>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [dns-at-ietf] Re: Discussion: big groups vs small, focused groups
List-Id: "This list is to discuss the structure of DNS work in the IETF, and DNSOP in particular." <dns-at-ietf.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-at-ietf/gAG7jBYpqMXKQTGZwEK4DHQM57E>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-at-ietf>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-at-ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:dns-at-ietf-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-at-ietf@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dns-at-ietf-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dns-at-ietf-leave@ietf.org>
Petr Špaček <pspacek@isc.org> writes: > On 06. 11. 25 7:03, Wes Hardaker wrote: > > Petr Špaček <pspacek@isc.org> writes: Thanks for responding with significant additional context, greatly appreciated! -- Wes Hardaker Google
- [dns-at-ietf] Discussion: big groups vs small, fo… Wes Hardaker
- [dns-at-ietf] Re: Discussion: big groups vs small… Ted Lemon
- [dns-at-ietf] Re: Discussion: big groups vs small… Eliot Lear
- [dns-at-ietf] Re: Discussion: big groups vs small… Eliot Lear
- [dns-at-ietf] Re: Discussion: big groups vs small… Wes Hardaker
- [dns-at-ietf] Re: Discussion: big groups vs small… Wes Hardaker
- [dns-at-ietf] Re: Discussion: big groups vs small… Eliot Lear
- [dns-at-ietf] Re: Discussion: big groups vs small… Jim Reid
- [dns-at-ietf] Re: Discussion: big groups vs small… Paul Wouters
- [dns-at-ietf] Re: Discussion: big groups vs small… Wes Hardaker
- [dns-at-ietf] Re: Discussion: big groups vs small… Paul Wouters
- [dns-at-ietf] Re: Discussion: big groups vs small… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- [dns-at-ietf] Re: Discussion: big groups vs small… Wes Hardaker
- [dns-at-ietf] Re: Discussion: big groups vs small… Paul Ebersman
- [dns-at-ietf] Re: Discussion: big groups vs small… Petr Špaček
- [dns-at-ietf] Re: Discussion: big groups vs small… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- [dns-at-ietf] Re: Discussion: big groups vs small… Wes Hardaker
- [dns-at-ietf] Re: Discussion: big groups vs small… Wes Hardaker
- [dns-at-ietf] Re: Discussion: big groups vs small… Petr Špaček
- [dns-at-ietf] Re: Discussion: big groups vs small… kehan yao
- [dns-at-ietf] Re: Discussion: big groups vs small… Wes Hardaker
- [dns-at-ietf] Re: Discussion: big groups vs small… Ondřej Surý
- [dns-at-ietf] Re: Discussion: big groups vs small… Peter Thomassen
- [dns-at-ietf] Re: Discussion: big groups vs small… Peter Thomassen
- [dns-at-ietf] Re: Discussion: big groups vs small… Petr Špaček
- [dns-at-ietf] Re: Discussion: big groups vs small… Jim Mozley