[dns-dir] draft-irtf-rrg-ilnp-dns-02.txt
Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 17 May 2012 14:21 UTC
Return-Path: <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dns-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8167821F8652 for <dns-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 May 2012 07:21:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.168
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.168 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.368, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, SARE_SUB_RAND_LETTRS4=0.799, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HqBmOguog6N8 for <dns-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 May 2012 07:21:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qa0-f44.google.com (mail-qa0-f44.google.com [209.85.216.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A85AB21F85C6 for <dns-dir@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 May 2012 07:21:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qadz3 with SMTP id z3so5677570qad.10 for <dns-dir@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 May 2012 07:21:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id :to:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=A2K/5upXjKVCHsEHMd5r48pePbpND1aY9K/ZVMqlUmQ=; b=UOS+lBCbE74YxF1Ozg8lPgkq/DMsp2Mm3louPpGWrMLiNBIXbM0H3bcibldBe/UcRf hH1CVrIr/edKLR9Z9aTJZ/m2QAjf1AprJ76eDw87gjAaxQ7Fnu+4G5eyssoF4sLJ7kad 5dy8M62TZsNl4vwKS8bFK5ZHbKZA39J3dT6nG+LtdeFiVrmAiAArM3eba+AHTG4K5mCJ sdF9NOJOKnlv3qO46JHAHSpMnnnXMrzkPsIbHiQrZuIMsUl13RUbddVG34hwDmXaogy+ UEAPs6rb/Q9E7Ao40rlWfqflsrj0qm/SMaxzoTrJaYFid8H/dnYV+UrukmeluBXaoL2g T+0w==
Received: by 10.224.222.142 with SMTP id ig14mr16577421qab.85.1337264517129; Thu, 17 May 2012 07:21:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rtp-rdroms-8912.cisco.com (rtp-isp-nat1.cisco.com. [64.102.254.33]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id df2sm15024987qab.8.2012.05.17.07.21.55 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 17 May 2012 07:21:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 10:21:53 -0400
Message-Id: <6E07B990-2A03-45E4-AA30-6C6C52692D8E@gmail.com>
To: IETF DNS Directorate <dns-dir@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
Subject: [dns-dir] draft-irtf-rrg-ilnp-dns-02.txt
X-BeenThere: dns-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNS directorate discussion list <dns-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-dir>, <mailto:dns-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dns-dir>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-dir>, <mailto:dns-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 14:21:58 -0000
The IESG has been asked to perform an RFC 5742 review of draft-irtf-rrg-ilnp-dns-02.txt.
I don't see any problems with the RRTYPE values requested from IANA, and I recommend publishing with the IESG note (1 from RFC 5742):
The IESG has concluded that there is no conflict between this
document and IETF work.
Are you all comfortable with the definition of the LP RR? Should it have stronger caveats against multiple levels of indirection; e.g., words to the effect that a the owner name of an LP RR must not appear as RDATA in another RR? Note that I can only make recommendations to the authors and I cannot require any changes in the document.
- Ralph
- [dns-dir] draft-irtf-rrg-ilnp-dns-02.txt Ralph Droms
- Re: [dns-dir] draft-irtf-rrg-ilnp-dns-02.txt Brian Haberman