Re: [dns-dir] draft-irtf-rrg-ilnp-dns-02.txt
Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net> Mon, 21 May 2012 15:28 UTC
Return-Path: <brian@innovationslab.net>
X-Original-To: dns-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 019B321F854B for <dns-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 May 2012 08:28:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.400, BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_SUB_RAND_LETTRS4=0.799, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nKlF9yUY3jnf for <dns-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 May 2012 08:28:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uillean.fuaim.com (uillean.fuaim.com [206.197.161.140]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2E1F21F8546 for <dns-dir@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 May 2012 08:28:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from clairseach.fuaim.com (clairseach.fuaim.com [206.197.161.141]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by uillean.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 945C588165 for <dns-dir@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 May 2012 08:28:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from clemson.local (nat-gwifi.jhuapl.edu [128.244.87.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by clairseach.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A13613680A8 for <dns-dir@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 May 2012 08:28:34 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4FBA5F20.9080901@innovationslab.net>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 11:28:32 -0400
From: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dns-dir@ietf.org
References: <6E07B990-2A03-45E4-AA30-6C6C52692D8E@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <6E07B990-2A03-45E4-AA30-6C6C52692D8E@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [dns-dir] draft-irtf-rrg-ilnp-dns-02.txt
X-BeenThere: dns-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNS directorate discussion list <dns-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-dir>, <mailto:dns-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dns-dir>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-dir>, <mailto:dns-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 15:28:38 -0000
On 5/17/12 10:21 AM, Ralph Droms wrote: > The IESG has been asked to perform an RFC 5742 review of > draft-irtf-rrg-ilnp-dns-02.txt. > > I don't see any problems with the RRTYPE values requested from IANA, > and I recommend publishing with the IESG note (1 from RFC 5742): > > The IESG has concluded that there is no conflict between this > document and IETF work. > > Are you all comfortable with the definition of the LP RR? Should it > have stronger caveats against multiple levels of indirection; e.g., > words to the effect that a the owner name of an LP RR must not appear > as RDATA in another RR? Note that I can only make recommendations to > the authors and I cannot require any changes in the document. > > - Ralph There is also some discussion of DNS considerations in the ILNP engineering considerations draft (draft-irtf-rrg-ilnp-eng). Regards, Brian
- [dns-dir] draft-irtf-rrg-ilnp-dns-02.txt Ralph Droms
- Re: [dns-dir] draft-irtf-rrg-ilnp-dns-02.txt Brian Haberman