Re: [dns-dir] [OPS-DIR] Fwd: [IESG-AGENDA-DIST] Summarized Agenda for the 2012-11-15 IESG Teleconference
Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Thu, 15 November 2012 18:07 UTC
Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dns-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4F4C21F8525; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 10:07:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.438
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.438 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.161, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n9FxSM-W9FSu; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 10:07:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from av-tac-bru.cisco.com (weird-brew.cisco.com [144.254.15.118]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 618A921F84F9; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 10:07:18 -0800 (PST)
X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned
Received: from strange-brew.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-bru.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qAFI7Cpo027605; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 19:07:12 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.60.67.87] (ams-bclaise-8916.cisco.com [10.60.67.87]) by strange-brew.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qAFI7Bei003122; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 19:07:12 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <50A52F4F.8060204@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 19:07:11 +0100
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
References: <20121108231217.12473.66688.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <509FCBB0.7090002@cisco.com> <50A13556.6050807@bogus.com>
In-Reply-To: <50A13556.6050807@bogus.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "ops-dir@ietf.org" <ops-dir@ietf.org>, IETF DNS Directorate <dns-dir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dns-dir] [OPS-DIR] Fwd: [IESG-AGENDA-DIST] Summarized Agenda for the 2012-11-15 IESG Teleconference
X-BeenThere: dns-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNS directorate discussion list <dns-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-dir>, <mailto:dns-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dns-dir>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-dir>, <mailto:dns-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 18:07:19 -0000
Joel, > commented on: > > draft-ietf-v6ops-ra-guard-implementation-05 > draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2671bis-edns0-09 > > On 11/11/12 8:00 AM, Benoit Claise wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> Please find below the agenda of the November 15th IESG telechat. >> Please send your questions, comments and concerns before Nov 14 COB. >> >> Thanks and Regards, Benoit >> >> ================================================ >> >> INTERNET ENGINEERING STEERING GROUP (IESG) >> Summarized Agenda for the 2012-11-15 IESG Teleconference >> >> This agenda was generated at 2012-11-08 15:10:41 PST >> Up-to-date web version of this agenda can be found at: >> http://datatracker.ietf.org/iesg/agenda/ >> >> 2. Protocol Actions >> 2.1 WG Submissions >> 2.1.1 New Items >> >> o draft-ietf-v6ops-ra-guard-implementation-05 >> Implementation Advice for IPv6 Router Advertisement Guard (RA-Guard) >> (Best Current Practice) >> Note: Joel Jaeggli (joelja@bogus.com) is the document shepherd. >> Token: Ronald Bonica > I'm a little wierded-out by pete's discuss on this one. > > "why isn't this a proposed standard" > > I guess that question I'd ask is why aren't refinements to an existing > informational draft that are the product of operational experience the > basis for a BCP. I disagree with the assertion that this is new > protocol work from the outset. I brought that up during the telechat, and the IESG feedback was: It is not protocol since it is really just a set of rules for building filters to protect against bad guys sending RAs >> >> o draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-delay-10 >> RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Extended Report (XR) Block for Delay >> metric Reporting (Proposed Standard) >> Note: Shida Schubert (shida@ntt-at.com) is the Document Shepherd. >> Token: Gonzalo Camarillo >> >> o draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-in-band-signaling-07 >> Multipoint LDP in-band signaling for Point-to-Multipoint and >> Multipoint- to-Multipoint Label Switched Paths (Proposed Standard) >> Note: Loa Andersson (loa@pi.nu) is the document shepherd. >> Token: Adrian Farrel >> >> o draft-ietf-mpls-ipv6-pw-lsp-ping-03 >> Label Switched Path (LSP) Ping for IPv6 Pseudowire FECs (Proposed >> Standard) >> Note: Loa Andersson (loa.andersson@ericsson.com) is the document >> shepherd. >> Token: Adrian Farrel >> >> o draft-ietf-ipfix-a9n-07 >> Flow Aggregation for the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Protocol >> (Proposed Standard) >> Note: Nevil Brownlee (n.brownlee@auckland.ac.nz) is the document >> shepherd. >> Token: Ronald Bonica >> >> 2.1.2 Returning Items >> >> o draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2671bis-edns0-09 >> Extension Mechanisms for DNS (EDNS(0)) (Internet Standard) >> Note: Olafur Gudmundsson (ogud at ogud.com) is the document >> shepherd. >> Token: Ralph Droms > Oerhaps I'm unreasable but I'd like to see the security considerations > section to take a stab at mitigations for the three described issues > given that those don't leave much to the imagination. I would suggest > that, the statements be non-normative since they likely are not > appropriate for all circumstances. I let Ralph answer that one. Regards, Benoit >> o draft-ietf-pkix-caa-15 >> DNS Certification Authority Authorization (CAA) Resource Record >> (Proposed Standard) >> Note: Steve Kent (kent@bbn.com) is the Document Shepherd. >> Token: Sean Turner >> >> 2.2 Individual Submissions >> 2.2.1 New Items >> >> o draft-leiba-5322upd-from-group-07 >> Update to Internet Message Format to Allow Group Syntax in the >> "From:" and "Sender:" Header Fields (Proposed Standard) >> Token: Pete Resnick >> >> o draft-gont-intarea-obsolete-eid-option-01 >> Obsoleting the Endpoint Identifier (EID) Option (Proposed Standard) >> Note: Christopher LILJENSTOLPE (liljenstolpe@gmail.com) is the >> document shepherd. >> Token: Ronald Bonica >> >> 2.2.2 Returning Items >> >> NONE >> >> 3. Document Actions >> 3.1 WG Submissions >> 3.1.1 New Items >> >> o draft-ietf-bmwg-protection-meth-12 >> Methodology for Benchmarking MPLS-TE Fast Reroute Protection >> (Informational) >> Note: Al Morton (acmorton@att.com) is the document shepherd. >> Token: Ronald Bonica >> >> o draft-ietf-mptcp-api-06 >> MPTCP Application Interface Considerations (Informational) >> Token: Wesley Eddy >> >> o draft-ietf-karp-ospf-analysis-05 >> Analysis of OSPF Security According to KARP Design Guide >> (Informational) >> Note: Brian Weis is the document shepherd. >> Token: Stewart Bryant >> >> 3.1.2 Returning Items >> >> NONE >> >> 3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD >> 3.2.1 New Items >> >> o draft-leiba-extended-doc-shepherd-01 >> Document Shepherding Throughout a Document's Lifecycle >> (Informational) >> Token: Russ Housley >> >> 3.2.2 Returning Items >> >> NONE >> >> 3.3 IRTF and Independent Submission Stream Documents >> 3.3.1 New Items >> >> o conflict-review-secure-cookie-session-protocol-00 >> IETF conflict review for draft-secure-cookie-session-protocol >> draft-secure-cookie-session-protocol-08 >> SCS: Secure Cookie Sessions for HTTP (ISE: Informational) >> Token: Barry Leiba >> >> 3.3.2 Returning Items >> >> NONE >> >> 3.3.3 For Action >> >> o conflict-review-boucadair-mmusic-altc-00 >> IETF conflict review for draft-boucadair-mmusic-altc >> draft-boucadair-mmusic-altc-06 >> Session Description Protocol (SDP) Alternate Connectivity (ALTC) >> Attribute (ISE: Informational) >> Token: Russ Housley >> >> 4. Working Group Actions >> 4.1 WG Creation >> 4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review >> >> NONE >> >> 4.1.2 Proposed for Approval >> >> NONE >> >> 4.2 WG Rechartering >> 4.2.1 Under Evaluation for IETF Review >> >> NONE >> >> 4.2.2 Proposed for Approval >> >> NONE >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OPS-DIR mailing list >> OPS-DIR@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ops-dir >> > >
- [dns-dir] Fwd: [IESG-AGENDA-DIST] Summarized Agen… Benoit Claise
- Re: [dns-dir] [OPS-DIR] Fwd: [IESG-AGENDA-DIST] S… joel jaeggli
- Re: [dns-dir] [OPS-DIR] Fwd: [IESG-AGENDA-DIST] S… Benoit Claise