[dns-privacy] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-dprive-xfr-over-tls-11: (with COMMENT)

Robert Wilton via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 06 May 2021 09:16 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietf.org
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 036B53A19B3; Thu, 6 May 2021 02:16:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Robert Wilton via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-dprive-xfr-over-tls@ietf.org, dprive-chairs@ietf.org, dns-privacy@ietf.org, tjw.ietf@gmail.com, tjw.ietf@gmail.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.28.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <162029258799.4438.17810066446598908741@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 02:16:28 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/57mYxTIEc-YBL8N7ZluX0pXhGxs>
Subject: [dns-privacy] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-dprive-xfr-over-tls-11: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 09:16:28 -0000

Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dprive-xfr-over-tls-11: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dprive-xfr-over-tls/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi,

Thank you for this document.

I was surprised by the length of this document - i.e., 40 pages to say to use
TLS rather than TCP, and noting that DoH is only 20 pages long!

But in reality, this document seems to be more than just zone transfers over
TLS and seems to clarify/optimize various behavior related to using TCP
connection handling.

I have a few concrete suggestions that you are at liberty to handle as you see
fit:

(1) Please ensure that the abstract accurately summarizes the focus on the
document, with a sentence of two summarizing the updates to RFC1995, RFC5936
and RFC7766.

(2) I presume that section 21.3 is intended to be deleted (since the references
appear to only be from section 16 which is planned to be removed), if so adding
a RFC editor note would be helpful.

(3) It wasn't clear to me whether the text in the appendix is meant to be
normative or illustrative.   It might be helpful to be clear which it is meant
to be.

Regards,
Rob