IETF Logo Mail Archive

[dns-privacy] [Step 2] More discussion needed: state your opinion

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Tue, 13 December 2016 11:00 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC0CC1295C7 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 03:00:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.796
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.796 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Yl0GbkHUdjqM for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 03:00:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (mx4.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:2::4:12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1049E1293EE for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 03:00:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 55A4428044F for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 12:00:06 +0100 (CET)
Received: from relay2.nic.fr (relay2.nic.fr [192.134.4.163]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 515972803B9 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 12:00:06 +0100 (CET)
Received: from b12.nic.fr (b12.tech.ipv6.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:1348:7::86:133]) by relay2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FBD1B38003 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 11:59:36 +0100 (CET)
Received: by b12.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 49AB73FC09; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 11:59:36 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 11:59:36 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: dns-privacy@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20161213105936.opaqw6hwwkx3txk2@nic.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux stretch/sid
X-Kernel: Linux 4.7.0-1-amd64 x86_64
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20161126 (1.7.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/6LBHbVbxSZIvD9FV7S-CD_7290A>
Subject: [dns-privacy] [Step 2] More discussion needed: state your opinion
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 11:00:10 -0000

In the minutes of the Seoul meeting, we see:

Strong hum for sticking around to work on this.
Terry (as AD): more mailing list discussion, please

So, this email is to request this
discussion. draft-bortzmeyer-dprive-step-2-04 is published, with all
the remarks from the Seoul meeting integrated. Now, it is time to give
an advice on things like:

1) Use TLS for the resolver-to-auth link, or not?

2) Which authentication(s) to use?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email