IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dns-privacy] [Step 2] More discussion needed: state your opinion

"Christian Huitema" <huitema@huitema.net> Fri, 16 December 2016 01:18 UTC

Return-Path: <huitema@huitema.net>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C68AC129C13 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 17:18:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.602
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.602 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YNGCZa4ipM2V for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 17:18:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx36-42.antispamcloud.com (mx36-42.antispamcloud.com [209.126.121.30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCB2E129C18 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 17:18:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from xsmtp24.mail2web.com ([168.144.250.190] helo=xsmtp04.mail2web.com) by mx36.antispamcloud.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from <huitema@huitema.net>) id 1cHh9v-0000tJ-8u for dns-privacy@ietf.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 02:18:04 +0100
Received: from [10.5.2.13] (helo=xmail03.myhosting.com) by xsmtp04.mail2web.com with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <huitema@huitema.net>) id 1cHh9t-00022Y-Q8 for dns-privacy@ietf.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 20:18:02 -0500
Received: (qmail 21127 invoked from network); 16 Dec 2016 01:18:00 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO icebox) (Authenticated-user:_huitema@huitema.net@[172.56.39.108]) (envelope-sender <huitema@huitema.net>) by xmail03.myhosting.com (qmail-ldap-1.03) with ESMTPA for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; 16 Dec 2016 01:18:00 -0000
From: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
To: "'Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)'" <tireddy@cisco.com>, 'Stephen Farrell' <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, 'Paul Hoffman' <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, 'Shane Kerr' <shane@time-travellers.org>
References: <20161213105936.opaqw6hwwkx3txk2@nic.fr> <20161213154625.6b314fe6@pallas.home.time-travellers.org> <95029041-8B56-460B-820A-B22D162019AB@vpnc.org> <046801d25579$4ec91350$ec5b39f0$@huitema.net> <ca21e0b1-3dd8-a2e7-b238-fc00b1560e54@cs.tcd.ie> <45e7fd2609e642578832a3bcb420dc8e@XCH-RCD-017.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <45e7fd2609e642578832a3bcb420dc8e@XCH-RCD-017.cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 17:17:53 -0800
Message-ID: <079701d2573a$3b501770$b1f04650$@huitema.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQFOSiWhUZuu/Zj6DgPpW0hPwYFinwFg/goWASL/RcYA26JPAgFql4/IAGroF3ih6DZxoA==
Content-Language: en-us
X-Filter-ID: s0sct1PQhAABKnZB5plbIVbU93hg6Kq00BjAzYBqWlUcW8ntawmIBRrYFzUH2lbvx1wTMkEUUoeb KIhkyzl2dMD84CdlHJbZpXfVpH2iQWPKjWpemvjPPnLWAUAtrJw6wnPxZ9F4epQ52HWf889wXEVF xnZC1Xpyrl7H4OGyGO+p3IUme8CirfAMDtyKqEi5XPWlFdaGOH191uXjgjQN/WjoOXRxlleb2yyi uWGTNRoknwCZQPj4MHaAbKQq7ecKrHs1L6/GXXx6fSGPiEpmWGz49PzUWhdE3zEeQF2k5bcYAwDu lsY4Ho3v0OGVvN0R647lNwN4qOsSZg+fYhVZGxGFLkXq2SG0afEw4VWGU6D92Jp30KsZ3LA9tVtN jTlSrOjsBxSo3OuQ7WRDUhbxp0/QyasP/PfdU+ra8YOmpkg5YB7NmDpY7XDRFc8RZREOX0OBqlFr 4Ke6YZEqr9GbKpnckpWaLvahyBjmQxBKOzsjHTG/W4waT9lPnwdKa+XTE0SqVfmoEAQghaDm3pPh rei7XklS7Y3XP2AQol4mrqb7TBihfx8aX0IpUOmQfl7pANRUfkFjthfvkYMyqnVcYnSOjCd5tjJG tAG9qTyK2sqOTrCIYgKBFgPB/dUPX37jfK16wbrYxGdZsqWsws7VmG2ltCpWyO6HQmWtbGwhy4GH SD4zZ3tsKPiZ81C+GJj2qyTkTVQTXp6bEK+vOiV+3g==
X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@quarantine5.antispamcloud.com
X-Originating-IP: 168.144.250.190
X-SpamExperts-Domain: xsmtpout.mail2web.com
X-SpamExperts-Username: 168.144.250.0/24
Authentication-Results: antispamcloud.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=168.144.250.0/24@xsmtpout.mail2web.com
X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Class: unsure
X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Evidence: Combined (0.27)
X-Classification: unsure/combined
X-Recommended-Action: accept
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/ZFwvtLoR1h_W6Pn6EyVB48hmAao>
Cc: dns-privacy@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] [Step 2] More discussion needed: state your opinion
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 01:18:13 -0000

On Thursday, December 15, 2016 1:03 AM, Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy) wrote:
>
> How will DNS benefit from QUIC ?
> DNS can use (D)TLS 1.3 just like QUIC using TLS 1.3.

Because QUIC allows for application messages of arbitrary length. That means there is no need with QUIC to fall back to TCP when the message exceeds a certain size, and that's a big advantage over DTLS.

-- Christian Huitema

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email