Re: [dns-privacy] Still interested in recursive-to-authoritative

Speaking again for PCH and Quad9, we have, and the current draft incorporates our views. 

                -Bill

> On May 18, 2018, at 15:21, Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi All,
> 
>> On 5/16/18 4:03 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>> While we wait for the charter update, I'd still like to find out who is
>> interested in pursuing draft-bortzmeyer-dprive-resolver-to-auth.
>> Personally, I think it is a good start on an important topic, but I
>> don't hear others supporting it on the list...
> 
> First, thanks to Paul for starting this query. The list has been quite
> silent since the London meeting.
> 
> Second, thanks to all the folks who have chimed in voicing support for
> an existing document.
> 
> What I will ask now is that those who are interested in the current
> draft to start providing detailed reviews of the draft to see if we can
> find some consensus on the approach. It is critical that these reviews
> come from both an implementation and an operational/deployment point of
> view.
> 
> Regards,
> Brian
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dns-privacy mailing list
> dns-privacy@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy