IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dns-privacy] Still interested in recursive-to-authoritative

Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net> Fri, 18 May 2018 02:03 UTC

Return-Path: <woody@pch.net>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71F18126BF7 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 May 2018 19:03:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VR-A1ru9PP8b for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 May 2018 19:03:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.pch.net (keriomail.pch.net [206.220.231.84]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B460C126BF3 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 May 2018 19:03:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Footer: cGNoLm5ldA==
Received: from [10.67.198.118] ([85.248.21.171]) (authenticated user woody@pch.net) by mail.pch.net (Kerio Connect 9.2.5 patch 3) with ESMTPSA (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256 bits)) for dns-privacy@ietf.org; Thu, 17 May 2018 19:03:48 -0700
From: Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_8C758658-CD63-4150-94E9-4147783FF3F0"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.3 \(3445.6.18\))
Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 04:03:05 +0200
References: <3AB1B0F3-8903-46C0-90A0-D62EF81A6062@vpnc.org> <alpine.DEB.2.11.1805171246200.1809@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <C03116D4-5FC7-47D1-9C25-A154069357B3@sinodun.com> <CAHw9_iKTXS6w770k7xV5igGJAyDvQHHrHwTCwNgApUDmYZBPKg@mail.gmail.com> <1526575427.79067.1375778680.196DD7F9@webmail.messagingengine.com>
To: dns-privacy@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <1526575427.79067.1375778680.196DD7F9@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Message-Id: <67A88F2C-E3C9-44D7-97A4-41311AD09626@pch.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.6.18)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/h6h-eJ2PIr-xLE6x6utPgHxUVmU>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] Still interested in recursive-to-authoritative
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 02:04:00 -0000

>> While we wait for the charter update, I'd still like to find out who is
>> interested in pursuing draft-bortzmeyer-dprive-resolver-to-auth.

We (PCH and Quad9) strongly support it.

                                -Bill

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email