Re: [dns-privacy] RE I-D Action: draft-ietf-dprive-dnsodtls-08.txt

"Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Thu, 11 August 2016 00:59 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5071212D08E for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 17:59:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pwTYc3PYEbCQ for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 17:59:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2521A12D0BB for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 17:59:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.32.60.150] (50-1-98-193.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.98.193]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.proper.com (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id u7B0xtNd007454 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 17:59:56 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: mail.proper.com: Host 50-1-98-193.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.98.193] claimed to be [10.32.60.150]
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
To: "dns-privacy@ietf.org" <dns-privacy@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 17:59:55 -0700
Message-ID: <DA36CE13-9014-4AD4-A9A8-7D0E67772815@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <4A83C51B-9CDE-432B-9910-5471DDE88828@sinodun.com>
References: <ed800ee55c434c56b4d27af9125043f5@XCH-RCD-017.cisco.com> <4A83C51B-9CDE-432B-9910-5471DDE88828@sinodun.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.4r5234)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/LAq-z6QsdXb2LKwXitdDm1v7M9g>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] RE I-D Action: draft-ietf-dprive-dnsodtls-08.txt
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 00:59:58 -0000

(Glad to see the interaction between Sara and Tiru; responding on just 
one point.)

On 8 Aug 2016, at 5:21, Sara Dickinson wrote:

>>> With regard to the separate 
>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wing-dprive-
>>> profile-and-msg-flows-01 I’ll re-iterate my question from the 
>>> Yokohama WG:
>>> Is there anything DNS specific in the draft? I don’t recall 
>>> anything particularly
>>> DNS specific. I definitely see value in a draft comparing message 
>>> flows
>>> between TLS and DTLS in general, but my feeling is it might be 
>>> better
>>> progressed though another working group with more (D)TLS experts - 
>>> TLS or
>>> UTA ?
>>
>> I don't think other WG will care enough for this draft, maybe the 
>> chairs can request reviewers from the above WG’s.
>
> I’d be interested to know what others think about this.

I disagree with Tiru: I think other WGs *will* care about it. It could 
go in the TLS WG, but I suspect it will get moldy there waiting for TLS 
1.3 to finish. I think SAAG could take this on, or maybe spin up a 
short, narrow WG for it.

--Paul Hoffman