Re: [dns-privacy] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dprive-dnsodtls-08.txt

"Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Mon, 01 August 2016 03:55 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 709B312B020 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 20:55:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3PyVhVX_Aeb7 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 20:55:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1691212B007 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 20:55:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.101] (50-1-98-193.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.98.193]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.proper.com (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id u713tYCG071446 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 20:55:34 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: mail.proper.com: Host 50-1-98-193.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.98.193] claimed to be [10.20.30.101]
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
To: "dns-privacy@ietf.org" <dns-privacy@ietf.org>
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2016 20:55:33 -0700
Message-ID: <85A543CC-B11D-4DA3-A434-3312DAB95476@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <8631e653c333405593ebf290a92d1d00@XCH-RCD-017.cisco.com>
References: <20160729031731.24771.21372.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <bfdd65ede7b54a7e92f867e7fdeedd9f@XCH-RCD-017.cisco.com> <019A5D2A-B055-4F67-B552-D89406EECD80@vpnc.org> <8631e653c333405593ebf290a92d1d00@XCH-RCD-017.cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.4r5234)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/QDI9qRCHmtBpsd8ThPlAAdh3fsA>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dprive-dnsodtls-08.txt
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2016 03:55:38 -0000

On 31 Jul 2016, at 20:23, Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy) wrote:

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: dns-privacy [mailto:dns-privacy-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of 
>> Paul
>> Hoffman
>> Sent: Friday, July 29, 2016 10:27 PM
>> To: dns-privacy@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] I-D Action: 
>> draft-ietf-dprive-dnsodtls-08.txt
>>
>> I think this document is ready for WG Last Call. I would like to see 
>> more direct
>> comparison to RFC 7858 for expected server overhead and expected 
>> round
>> trips after deployment of TLS 1.3, but those can come during WG Last 
>> Call
>> discussion.
>
> Comparison b/w DTLS and TLS, and TLS 1.3 is discussed in 
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wing-dprive-profile-and-msg-flows-01. 
> Please review.

Unless we are sure that that document is going to be published, I think 
the comparison should be in draft-ietf-dprive-dnsodtls.

Chairs: are we going to progress the msg-flows document?

--Paul Hoffman