Re: [dns-privacy] Amortization techniques for less popular name server names
Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Tue, 17 November 2020 01:28 UTC
Return-Path: <dot@dotat.at>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B2703A1824 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 17:28:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4-35QYFjilXf for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 17:28:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ppsw-41.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-41.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.141]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B646A3A1823 for <dprive@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 17:28:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://help.uis.cam.ac.uk/email-scanner-virus
Received: from grey.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.57.57]:34314) by ppsw-41.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.139]:25) with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) id 1kepnU-000Vt4-Qk (Exim 4.92.3) (return-path <dot@dotat.at>); Tue, 17 Nov 2020 01:28:40 +0000
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 01:28:40 +0000
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
To: Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com>
cc: "dprive@ietf.org" <dprive@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <EACB9BFD-50B0-4105-B38D-C3C33210892E@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.2011170124550.25321@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <EACB9BFD-50B0-4105-B38D-C3C33210892E@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/N65Giv2r-RpzTiEie7njOn6iGEc>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] Amortization techniques for less popular name server names
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 01:28:44 -0000
Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com> wrote: > Attempting to do XFR for many name servers which are infrequently used > would have scalability issues from any resolver, if the server names are > in a large number of zones. One approach to reducing this issue is > aggregating server names inside many fewer zones. Doing this aggregation > creates trust issues, however. Summarizing brutally :-) this sounds a bit like a combination between DLV and hyperlocal root zones? Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <dot@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ Thames, Dover: Southwest 5 to 7. Moderate or rough, occasionally slight later. Rain or drizzle at first. Moderate or good, occasionally poor.
- [dns-privacy] Amortization techniques for less po… Brian Dickson
- Re: [dns-privacy] Amortization techniques for les… Tony Finch
- Re: [dns-privacy] Amortization techniques for les… Brian Dickson