IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dns-privacy] Amortization techniques for less popular name server names

Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com> Tue, 17 November 2020 01:46 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9D2D3A1851 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 17:46:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a5F6XcwgAc5c for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 17:46:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ua1-x92d.google.com (mail-ua1-x92d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::92d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83D4A3A184F for <dprive@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 17:46:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ua1-x92d.google.com with SMTP id q68so6018141uaq.3 for <dprive@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 17:46:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=eEGlj9h9gEkuSNNabvuNegG+Xlq7LeJjpG7Cay3iIG8=; b=JzCLZdZr4OonJ12Z5PRTaxzWfEyuw0IPNvh3VaUuWU8kgM+2DBPJ/vxKzUMVDGsHUv gWdl2NNDYLyza0KDoHyOXgzMY85Um+z8pPy4+PklAUZD4f8kmGhlkjtnKTXbqKW5180e PTVlDDZxtaG07mhV05OqHToqHdzfEr3NCa/PIXzzF+IYhIgK23eu4MmJvT8vTxL0n63N Yx4saQk44ium1EW244vbOwt/7xRfmqdUNwPZq7aXOH5JED8JBlRtqPnLN+y6gsR3f8qc /IAh4oADDyYJAkUW87fIYxJd1SBVyT+k+O7kPEsbXS+1EKQsGMPpNXNvquKfoK7V42ro 9K8Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=eEGlj9h9gEkuSNNabvuNegG+Xlq7LeJjpG7Cay3iIG8=; b=P7774HuWQSo9zKRvDR/F9+v0iAOU6YLdjPvWlyYlpMdLom/+IomxYWQrsEfs16J/2j D+pB+qF9yh7dofgUNzGF3AIrhG/kSAn3fB31BmEHHbxHLKcH4figonP2MdN/zBAErCVR x37ozP/LV+bVDS8H4IQpD5ZoEQ2PLFXy/ByJbFzub3U7K1o7RKkLrjI/DQ5FAiPKJQtC 37KpPGqWYajg+rCySTyRj+HbXXxxHbpB7mxq5eWCzeOky5oJLH9Sqea5CsKFT68aX7DC zTuMzEbA0lajqOea8AYdvT5i7M3gOhvpblPxAPfatK7YOEqIQchmpulGBVMxfkXxvazx 9sng==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532VrvnAqU6fTsRPVonn/wU934ldikkKuohysINyzDpbjJlrdra4 ExzvekQUIgZum1c+m5HTssczFU1VJ1TSExtEDrgv4q+m
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwI6vlzKXg3pXHxNx6k+/cPUefuWiQ8OrZKFETtdVWQh7uibeImSLTNvD1k76msNf7qpf4/dEIvib1PI7+5J9s=
X-Received: by 2002:ab0:688c:: with SMTP id t12mr8631538uar.87.1605577569478; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 17:46:09 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <EACB9BFD-50B0-4105-B38D-C3C33210892E@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.2011170124550.25321@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.2011170124550.25321@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
From: Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 17:45:58 -0800
Message-ID: <CAH1iCiq6-8z4UAggDZDOStekpbtUFbJ4RQ1zzsU86pjA78vJkA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
Cc: "dprive@ietf.org" <dprive@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b02b9f05b443a8ff"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/YmMvkLkVJy7laufVeN3jj3WmBr8>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] Amortization techniques for less popular name server names
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 01:46:12 -0000

On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 5:28 PM Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> wrote:

> Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Attempting to do XFR for many name servers which are infrequently used
> > would have scalability issues from any resolver, if the server names are
> > in a large number of zones. One approach to reducing this issue is
> > aggregating server names inside many fewer zones. Doing this aggregation
> > creates trust issues, however.
>
> Summarizing brutally :-) this sounds a bit like a combination between DLV
> and hyperlocal root zones?
>

Yes, exactly. (When I was writing it up, that thought even crossed my mind.)
The irony is not lost on me, either. :-)

Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email