IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dns-privacy] Joel Jaeggli's Discuss on draft-ietf-dprive-edns0-padding-02: (with DISCUSS)

Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Tue, 01 March 2016 01:05 UTC

Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85A351A871D; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 17:05:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.006] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9WM2vk_Aeiyp; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 17:05:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 850EF1A8715; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 17:05:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [25.118.221.217] ([172.56.40.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id u2115GtM039321 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 1 Mar 2016 01:05:17 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (13D15)
In-Reply-To: <20160301005317.3C8B643838CC@rock.dv.isc.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 17:05:10 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3BF4E7CC-D908-4C7A-8811-F464F996589C@bogus.com>
References: <20160229195527.11806.46599.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20160229223447.78935641@pallas.home.time-travellers.org> <31a8330c-b14a-bd75-5432-380758f95a2c@bogus.com> <CAHw9_i+3Gu+Uoe+k3pgCtUUU_dj9N9VbBgiVhYPe4e73XVGdOA@mail.gmail.com> <20160301005317.3C8B643838CC@rock.dv.isc.org>
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/WKJTaQ98bDDjMyjCsZS-eXfyUrA>
Cc: Shane Kerr <shane@time-travellers.org>, tjw.ietf@gmail.com, draft-ietf-dprive-edns0-padding@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, dprive-chairs@ietf.org, dns-privacy@ietf.org, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] Joel Jaeggli's Discuss on draft-ietf-dprive-edns0-padding-02: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 01:05:21 -0000


Sent from my iPhone

> On Feb 29, 2016, at 16:53, Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> If you want warn fuzzies then say MUST NOT otherwise it is just
> noise.
> 
> You can't enforce it.  Do you throw away clear text packets with
> the option in the request / response?  Adding it won't break anything.
> You make testing more difficult by saying MUST NOT.
> 
> I don't intend to change a line of code to support the pad option
> in named.  I might add it to dig for testing but that is about it.
> named will just continue to ignore the option on requests.

Well if you ignore it obviously that suits me fine.

As  the recipient of a lot unwanted port 53 source traffic I'd prefer that the implementation guidance strongly discourage situations where it can be used against me in anger.

> 
> Mark
> 
> -- 
> Mark Andrews, ISC
> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
> PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka@isc.org
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email