IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dns-privacy] New Version Notification for draft-zuo-dprive-encryption-over-udp-00.txt

"Jiankang Yao" <yaojk@cnnic.cn> Wed, 08 July 2015 03:36 UTC

Return-Path: <yaojk@cnnic.cn>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 981451B2E96 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 20:36:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dbXHa7ZvgMkm for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 20:36:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cnnic.cn (smtp13.cnnic.cn [218.241.118.13]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CB471B2E9E for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 20:28:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from healthyao-THINK (unknown [218.241.103.29]) by ocmail02.zx.nicx.cn (Coremail) with SMTP id AQAAf0DZ4ZXWmJxV6mqJBw--.5608S2; Wed, 08 Jul 2015 11:28:22 +0800 (CST)
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 11:28:21 +0800
From: Jiankang Yao <yaojk@cnnic.cn>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
References: <2015070714161016259349@cnnic.cn>, <DBBE76F9-49BB-44B4-B77A-5CFFCD4B76CD@vpnc.org>
X-Priority: 3
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.0.1.92[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2015070811281633896758@cnnic.cn>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart354373882878_=----"
X-CM-TRANSID: AQAAf0DZ4ZXWmJxV6mqJBw--.5608S2
X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvdXoWrKr1DGw4rKF1fZF45ur1UGFg_yoWxKwc_ur WDGa1xZr4YgFyqqa1kGw4Sk3y7Jw4Y9Fy8CF4DJw4ayas7Cw4qgr9Fv392yw1fur1DGrZ8 Zr9ay342yF9rCjkaLaAFLSUrUUUUUb8apTn2vfkv8UJUUUU8Yxn0WfASr-VFAUDa7-sFnT 9fnUUIcSsGvfJTRUUUbDAYjsxI4VW3JwAYFVCjjxCrM7AC8VAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1l1xkIjI8I 6I8E6xAIw20EY4v20xvaj40_Wr0E3s1l1IIY67AEw4v_Jr0_Jr4l8cAvFVAK0II2c7xJM2 8CjxkF64kEwVA0rcxSw2x7M28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVW7JVWDJwA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0 cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxVWxJVW8Jr1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv67AKxVWxJr0_GcWl84ACjcxK6I 8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26rxl6s0DM2AIxVAIcxkEcVAq07x20xvEncxIr21l5I8CrVCF0I0E 4I0vr24lYx0E2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_Jr4lYx0Ex4A2jsIE14v26r1j6r4UMcvjeVCFs4 IE7xkEbVWUJVW8JwACjcxG0xvY0x0EwIxGrwACY4xI67k04243AVAKzVAKj4xxM4xvF2IE b7IF0Fy26I8I3I1lc7CjxVAKzI0EY4vE52x082I5MxkIecxEwVAFwVW8GwCF04k20xvY0x 0EwIxGrwCFx2IqxVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJVW8JwC20s026c02F40E14v26r106r1rMI8I3I0E 7480Y4vE14v26r106r1rMI8E67AF67kF1VAFwI0_Jrv_JF1lIxkGc2Ij64vIr41lIxAIcV C0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUCwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lIxAIcVCF 04k26cxKx2IYs7xG6rW3Jr0E3s1lIxAIcVC2z280aVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lIxAIcVC2z280aV CY1x0267AKxVWUJVW8JwCE64xvF2IEb7IF0Fy7YxBIdaVFxhVjvjDU0xZFpf9x07jhPEhU UUUU=
X-CM-SenderInfo: x1dryyw6fq0xffof0/
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/di1O6QPbbgepY2NkhCHmydqGbv8>
Cc: dns-privacy <dns-privacy@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] New Version Notification for draft-zuo-dprive-encryption-over-udp-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: yaojk <yaojk@cnnic.cn>
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 03:36:26 -0000

thanks for your kind comments.
About the latency comparison, we will do more experiments and report it to the WG when it is available.




Jiankang Yao

From: Paul Hoffman
Date: 2015-07-07 22:17
To: yaojk
CC: dns-privacy
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] New Version Notification for draft-zuo-dprive-encryption-over-udp-00.txt
The introduction to this draft implies that it has less latency than DNS-over-DTLS, but gives no measurements in the body of the draft. Are such comparisons available so the WG can balance this against the DNS-over-DTLS proposal? Such a comparison is important, given that what you are proposing is a new encryption protocol, as compared to using the well-established DTLS.

--Paul Hoffman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email