Re: [dnsext] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC4343 (6361)
Dave Lawrence <tale@dd.org> Mon, 04 January 2021 19:16 UTC
Return-Path: <tale@dd.org>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A9123A0FDE; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 11:16:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v6dEwWP2oMKp; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 11:16:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gro.dd.org (host2.dlawren-3-gw.cust.sover.net [207.136.201.30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA4213A0FD5; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 11:16:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: by gro.dd.org (Postfix, from userid 102) id 51A3B12EEBE; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 14:15:59 -0500 (EST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <24563.26991.309998.571334@gro.dd.org>
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2021 14:15:59 -0500
From: Dave Lawrence <tale@dd.org>
To: me@kasparetter.com, Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com, evyncke@cisco.com, iesg@ietf.org, dnsext@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <20210104134129.E9403F40721@rfc-editor.org>
References: <20210104134129.E9403F40721@rfc-editor.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsext/-yuOC5lj8WeHQUrXZHbmg4nYFYY>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC4343 (6361)
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsext/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2021 19:16:05 -0000
RFC Errata System writes:
> After discussion with the RFC author and the errata author, the
> conclusion is that the RFC isn't wrong but is arguably unclear for
> some readers.
Agreed that it could be a little confusing when focusing on that one
sentence, despite the surrounding paragraphs trying to fill the
context. Was there new proposed text? Is this sufficient, given the
surrounding text?
Old: No "case conversion" or "case folding" is done
during such output operations, thus "preserving" case.
New: No "case conversion" or "case folding" is done on input octets
during such output operations, thus "preserving" case.
- [dnsext] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC434… RFC Errata System
- Re: [dnsext] [Errata Held for Document Update] RF… Dave Lawrence
- Re: [dnsext] [Errata Held for Document Update] RF… Kaspar Etter
- Re: [dnsext] [Errata Held for Document Update] RF… Donald Eastlake
- Re: [dnsext] [Errata Held for Document Update] RF… Mark Andrews