[dnsext] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC4343 (6361)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 04 January 2021 13:41 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8437A3A0D29; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 05:41:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jkO1ulrjz9Ud; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 05:41:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D89D63A0D28; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 05:41:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id E9403F40721; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 05:41:29 -0800 (PST)
To: me@kasparetter.com, Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: evyncke@cisco.com, iesg@ietf.org, dnsext@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20210104134129.E9403F40721@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2021 05:41:29 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsext/aRy5l4JC_p2hNJJVuVxZ_LFGDRU>
Subject: [dnsext] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC4343 (6361)
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsext/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2021 13:41:40 -0000
The following errata report has been held for document update for RFC4343, "Domain Name System (DNS) Case Insensitivity Clarification". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6361 -------------------------------------- Status: Held for Document Update Type: Technical Reported by: Kaspar Etter <me@kasparetter.com> Date Reported: 2020-12-22 Held by: Eric Vyncke (IESG) Section: 4.1 Original Text ------------- No "case conversion" or "case folding" is done during such output operations, thus "preserving" case. Corrected Text -------------- ? Notes ----- Whose case is preserved? The case of the label in the DNS query or the case of the label in the DNS database? In other words, if there is a DNS record for ietf.org and I query IETF.org, should the DNS response say ietf.org or IETF.org? I would expect it's the former so that the DNS administrator can inform the DNS requester about the preferred capitalization but I can't figure this out on the basis of the RFC. Does output case preservation refer to something else? All I observe is that tools like dig return the latter when I run 'dig IETF.org'. Maybe an errata is not the right place to ask for clarification but given the name of the RFC, I would expect to find a clear answer to this question in the RFC. -- verifier note -- After discussion with the RFC author and the errata author, the conclusion is that the RFC isn't wrong but is arguably unclear for some readers. -------------------------------------- RFC4343 (draft-ietf-dnsext-insensitive-06) -------------------------------------- Title : Domain Name System (DNS) Case Insensitivity Clarification Publication Date : January 2006 Author(s) : D. Eastlake 3rd Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : DNS Extensions Area : Internet Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [dnsext] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC434… RFC Errata System
- Re: [dnsext] [Errata Held for Document Update] RF… Dave Lawrence
- Re: [dnsext] [Errata Held for Document Update] RF… Kaspar Etter
- Re: [dnsext] [Errata Held for Document Update] RF… Donald Eastlake
- Re: [dnsext] [Errata Held for Document Update] RF… Mark Andrews