Re: [dnsext] Progress on moving the mailing list

Andrew Sullivan <> Fri, 01 October 2010 17:11 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80B4B3A6C2C; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 10:11:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.013
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.013 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.586, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j4LP8Yf-7qi3; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 10:11:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42C6A3A6918; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 10:11:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by with local (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <>) id 1P1j4M-0007rf-Gr for; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 17:06:50 +0000
Received: from ([]) by with esmtps (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <>) id 1P1j4K-0007oh-3c for; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 17:06:48 +0000
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 98D0E1ECB408 for <>; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 17:06:19 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 13:06:18 -0400
From: Andrew Sullivan <>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] Progress on moving the mailing list
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <> <> <>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <>
List-Unsubscribe: To unsubscribe send a message to with
List-Unsubscribe: the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
List-Archive: <>

On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 03:43:37AM +0000, Paul Vixie wrote:
> i feel strongly.  it's always been namedroppers.  before there was an ietf
> in its current, there was a namedroppers mailing list.  if ietf doesn't want
> to run the namedroppers mailing list (by that name) others should so offer.

Would it be acceptable to have a alias, or is it
necessary to create the list under the name and
have an alias from

If the latter, does anyone want to address Bill Manning's point that,
given that namedroppers has not always been the address for _this
working group's_ mailing list, reusing that list name for this WG
might be confusing?


Andrew Sullivan
Shinkuro, Inc.