IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] URI RRTYPE review - Comments period end Aug 15th

Klaus Malorny <Klaus.Malorny@knipp.de> Sun, 25 July 2010 19:31 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABEF83A699C; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 12:31:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 4.196
X-Spam-Level: ****
X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.196 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, FRT_BELOW2=2.154, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, HELO_MISMATCH_DE=1.448, MISSING_HEADERS=1.292, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id syxvlsMDnMSa; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 12:30:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69B783A6978; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 12:30:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>) id 1Od6qU-0003ti-Ue for namedroppers-data0@psg.com; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 19:26:46 +0000
Received: from [195.253.6.130] (helo=kmx10a.knipp.de) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <Klaus.Malorny@knipp.de>) id 1Od6qS-0003tP-Ln for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 19:26:44 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kmx10a.knipp.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6074A1C; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 21:26:41 +0200 (MESZ)
X-Knipp-VirusScanned: Yes
Received: from kmx10a.knipp.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kmx10a.knipp.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10004) with ESMTP id rym3N66cuRTB; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 21:26:36 +0200 (MESZ)
Received: from hp9000.do.knipp.de (hp9000.do.knipp.de [195.253.2.54]) by kmx10a.knipp.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C16DFA1A; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 21:26:36 +0200 (MESZ)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (klaus@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hp9000.do.knipp.de (@(#)Sendmail version 8.13.3 - Revision 1.000 - 1st August,2006/8.13.3) with ESMTP id o6PJQbXP001960; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 21:26:38 +0200 (MESZ)
Message-ID: <4C4C8FE8.8090305@knipp.de>
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 21:26:32 +0200
From: Klaus Malorny <Klaus.Malorny@knipp.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; Windows NT 5.1; rv:2.0b3pre) Gecko/20100725 Shredder/3.2a1pre
MIME-Version: 1.0
CC: namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] URI RRTYPE review - Comments period end Aug 15th
References: <20100725184119.GA42253@registro.br>
In-Reply-To: <20100725184119.GA42253@registro.br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <namedroppers.ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: To unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
List-Unsubscribe: the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
List-Archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>

On 2010-07-25 20:41, Frederico A C Neves wrote:
> Dear Colleagues,
>
> Bellow is a completed template requesting a new RRTYPE assignment
> under the procedures of RFC5395.
>
> This message starts a 3 weeks period for an expert-review of the DNS
> RRTYPE parameter allocation for URI specified in
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-faltstrom-uri-05
>
> If you have comments on the request, please post them here before Aug
> 15th 18:00 UTC
>
> Best Regards,
> Frederico Neves
>

Hi,

dumb question: I don't consider myself an expert in that respect, but wouldn't 
it make more sense nowadays to use UTF-8 encoded IRIs (RFC 3987) instead of 
URIs? Or is there a need to keep everything ASCII-safe?

Regards,

Klaus

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email