[dnsext] RRTYPE request: template for ZS record
Andrew Sullivan <ajs@shinkuro.com> Fri, 21 November 2008 19:10 UTC
Return-Path: <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3A4B3A68D0; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:10:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.35
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.35 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.750, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_INFO=1.448, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l2ks5J+P-JDu; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:10:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32E243A6939; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:10:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>) id 1L3bIL-000McD-Ng for namedroppers-data@psg.com; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 19:03:57 +0000
Received: from [208.86.224.201] (helo=mail.yitter.info) by psg.com with esmtps (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <ajs@shinkuro.com>) id 1L3bIG-000Mbp-Ad for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 19:03:54 +0000
Received: from crankycanuck.ca (unknown [130.129.29.194]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3AD2A2FE9555 for <namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 19:03:50 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:03:48 -0600
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@shinkuro.com>
To: namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Subject: [dnsext] RRTYPE request: template for ZS record
Message-ID: <20081121190348.GB20868@shinkuro.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="zhXaljGHf11kAtnf"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <namedroppers.ops.ietf.org>
Dear colleagues, Attached is a completed template requesting an RRTYPE assignment under the procudures of draft-ietf-dnsext-2929bis. This request will be evaluated by expert review. This mail initiates a three week comment period on the RRTYPE request. If you have comments on the request, please post them to this list. As we've been doing so far, we'll have all the appointed experts do the work this round. This is slightly at variance with the procedures as outlined in 2929bis; we're still getting experience with the procedures, and so it seems to me to be advantageous to duplicate effort for now to gain that experience. I anticipate that at some point in the future, we'll return to the practice of asking just one expert to perform the review. Best regards, Andrew -- Andrew Sullivan ajs@shinkuro.com Shinkuro, Inc.
# # $Id: zs-template.txt,v 1.3 2008/11/06 09:43:45 jim Exp $ # DNS RRTYPE PARAMETER ALLOCATION TEMPLATE A. Submission Date: 6/11/08 B. Submission Type: [x] New RRTYPE [ ] Modification to existing RRTYPE C. Contact Information for submitter: Name: Jim Reid Email Address: jim@telnic.org International telephone number: +44 20 7467 6474 Other contact handles: none (Note: This information will be publicly posted) D. Motivation for the new RRTYPE application? There is a need to provide a mechanism in the DNS to publish descriptive information about the status of the zone, particularly for zones holding real-time contact data. At present a variety of ad-hoc schemes and conventions are used. These approaches are confusing and impractical since an arbitrary DNS client needs a priori knowledge of which of these schemes, if any, has been used by a zone administrator. Assigning a new RRtype for a resource record to hold this information will provide a simple, standardised way of publishing and retrieving zone status information. E. Description of the proposed RR type. The proposed RRtype is essentially identical to a TXT record: the zone status information contained as free text in the RDATA. Further details about the record format and its potential applications is given in draft-reid-dnsext-zs-01.txt. F. What existing RRTYPE or RRTYPEs come closest to filling that need and why are they unsatisfactory? The TXT record is the closest RRtype to the one proposed here. However TXT records are already used in many zones for a variety of purposes. This makes it awkward and impractical to differentiate a TXT record containing zone status information from other TXT records that may exist for a domain name. Allocating a new, dedicated RRtype for zone status is the cleanest way to deal with this issue. It would also prevent further mission creep by overloading the already overloaded TXT RRtype. G. What mnemonic is requested for the new RRTYPE (optional)? Note: this can be left blank and the mnemonic decided after the template is accepted. ZS H. Does the requested RRTYPE make use of any existing IANA Registry or require the creation of a new IANA Sub-registry and in DNS Parameters? No. I. Does the proposal require/expect any changes in DNS servers/resolvers that prevent the new type from being processed as an unknown RRTYPE (see [RFC3597])? No. J. Comments: None. _______________________________________________ dns-rrtype-applications mailing list dns-rrtype-applications@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-rrtype-applications
- [dnsext] whois vs. Re:...template for ZS record Edward Lewis
- Re: [dnsext] RRTYPE request: template for ZS reco… Jim Reid
- Re: [dnsext] RRTYPE request: template for ZS reco… Otmar Lendl
- [dnsext] RRTYPE request: template for ZS record Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] RRTYPE request: template for ZS reco… Ted Hardie
- Re: [dnsext] RRTYPE request: template for ZS reco… Ted Hardie
- Re: [dnsext] RRTYPE request: template for ZS reco… Jim Reid
- Re: [dnsext] RRTYPE request: template for ZS reco… Ted Hardie
- Re: [dnsext] RRTYPE request: template for ZS reco… Olaf Kolkman
- Re: [dnsext] RRTYPE request: template for ZS reco… Kevin Darcy
- Re: [dnsext] RRTYPE request: template for ZS reco… Jim Reid
- Re: [dnsext] RRTYPE request: template for ZS reco… Jim Reid
- Re: [dnsext] RRTYPE request: template for ZS reco… bmanning
- [dnsext] 2929bis DNS assumptions [was RRTYPE requ… Olaf Kolkman
- Re: [dnsext] 2929bis DNS assumptions [was RRTYPE … Patrik Fältström
- Re: [dnsext] 2929bis DNS assumptions [was RRTYPE … Jaap Akkerhuis
- Re: [dnsext] 2929bis DNS assumptions [was RRTYPE … bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] RRTYPE request: template for ZS reco… Ted Hardie
- Re: [dnsext] RRTYPE request: template for ZS reco… Jim Reid
- Re: [dnsext] RRTYPE request: template for ZS reco… Jim Reid
- Re: [dnsext] RRTYPE request: template for ZS reco… bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] 2929bis DNS assumptions [was RRTYPE … Peter Koch
- Re: [dnsext] RRTYPE request: template for ZS reco… bert hubert
- Re: [dnsext] RRTYPE request: template for ZS reco… Peter Koch
- Re: [dnsext] RRTYPE request: template for ZS reco… Alex Bligh
- Re: [dnsext] RRTYPE request: template for ZS reco… Jim Reid
- Re: [dnsext] RRTYPE request: template for ZS reco… Alex Bligh
- Re: [dnsext] RRTYPE request: template for ZS reco… Edward Lewis
- Re: [dnsext] RRTYPE request: template for ZS reco… Ted Hardie
- RRTYPE love, was Re: [dnsext] RRTYPE request: tem… Shane Kerr
- Re: RRTYPE love, was Re: [dnsext] RRTYPE request:… Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: RRTYPE love, was Re: [dnsext] RRTYPE request:… Ted Hardie