Re: [dnsext] 2929bis DNS assumptions [was RRTYPE request: template for ZS record]

[[e-mail]]

On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 07:26:12AM -0600, Olaf Kolkman wrote:
> 
> 
> More to draft-ietf-dnsext-2929bis than to your request. I think that  
> if a specification assumes knowledge of administrative boundaries in  
> the domain namespace than that is an argument to deny the code point.  
> 
> --Olaf

perhaps a (-1) is useful here.  there are two points in the namespace graph
that assume some knowledge of the administrative boundaries...  the root and
the leaf.

if this WKS look-alike emerges -AND- is used in the RRset of a leaf, then it
is reasonable to assume certain adminstrative bounds and no real good reason
to deny the code point.

if someone uses this elsewhere in the graph, then it has no meaning.

--bill

--
to unsubscribe send a message to [e-mail] with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>