IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] WGLC on draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-signal-05

Miek Gieben <miek@miek.nl> Thu, 29 March 2012 08:43 UTC

Return-Path: <miekg@atoom.net>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C42A821F891E for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 01:43:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.312
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.312 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.288, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0+iNaH-wBOuN for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 01:43:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from elektron.atoom.net (cl-201.ede-01.nl.sixxs.net [IPv6:2001:7b8:2ff:c8::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B2B621F88D8 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 01:43:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by elektron.atoom.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id AB24E3FECD; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 10:43:13 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 10:43:13 +0200
From: Miek Gieben <miek@miek.nl>
To: dnsext@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20120329084313.GC10653@miek.nl>
Mail-Followup-To: dnsext@ietf.org
References: <201203271402.QAA03645@TR-Sys.de> <2E875509-4B39-4876-806D-E8FE49F83B9E@gmail.com> <a06240800cb98e84f6bb3@[192.168.130.74]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Bu8it7iiRSEf40bY"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <a06240800cb98e84f6bb3@[192.168.130.74]>
User-Agent: Vim/Mutt/Linux
X-Home: http://www.miek.nl
Subject: Re: [dnsext] WGLC on draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-signal-05
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 08:43:16 -0000

[ Quoting <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz> in "Re: [dnsext] WGLC on draft-ietf-dns..." ]
> These comments aren't meant to stop the current document processing
> bureaucracy from proceeding but offered as food for thought.  It it
> foreseeable that in 10-15 years we will have lots of things change in
> the DNS.  We know that we lack any version management capability (the
> RFC that defined SHA256 for DS hashes mentions this).  Although it
> will be an eon before we have one, we have to start somewhere.  And
> maybe the current document, such as it is, is the first step.  But in
> talking to people here this week, we could expand the idea.

I, for one, like this. Another IANA registry is one step too far I guess, but
re-using RFC numbers like this seems like an elegant solution.

Regards,
Miek Gieben

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email